diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index e7f4109a..b8a6a929 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 [![License: MIT](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-green)](LICENSE)
 [![Python 3.11+](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.11+-blue)](https://www.python.org/)
-[![Techniques](https://img.shields.io/badge/techniques-89-blueviolet)](references/technique_registry.json)
+[![Capabilities](https://img.shields.io/badge/capabilities-89-blueviolet)](references/technique_registry.json)
 [![Covered](https://img.shields.io/badge/covered-79-green)](references/technique_registry.json)
 [![Complete](https://img.shields.io/badge/complete-10-brightgreen)](references/technique_registry.json)
 [![Partial](https://img.shields.io/badge/partial-0-lightgrey)](references/technique_registry.json)
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 This is a **Vedic (Jyotish) astrology analysis system** designed for deep, auditable full-chart readings. It is NOT a simple ephemeris calculator — it is a multi-stage interpretive pipeline that:
 
 1. **Computes** divisional charts (D1/D9/D10/...) via Swiss Ephemeris
-2. **Runs** 89 registered techniques (Dashas, Yogas, Shadbala, Ashtakavarga, Transits...)
+2. **Routes** 89 capability entries as a backend evidence pool (Dashas, Yogas, Shadbala, Ashtakavarga, Transits...)
 3. **Routes** the analysis through strict workflow paths depending on question type (career / relationship / wealth / timing)
 4. **Audits** every technique used — declaring what was called, what is complete/covered, and which limitations affect confidence
 5. **Degrades gracefully** — limitations are labeled, not silently over-promising
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ This is a **Vedic (Jyotish) astrology analysis system** designed for deep, audit
 | Technique Audit Table (confidence labeling) | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
 | Capability degradation (limits are explicit) | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
 | MEVG external verification gates | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
-| 89 techniques registered | ✅ | ✅ (50+) | ✅ (200+) | ✅ |
+| 89 capability entries routed as a backend evidence pool | ✅ | ✅ (50+) | ✅ (200+) | ✅ |
 | Traditional algorithm benchmarked | ✅ mixed depth | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
 | Docker / MCP Server | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
 | English docs / PyPI package | ✅ in progress | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
@@ -454,7 +454,13 @@ The AI does NOT require the user to name techniques (e.g., "Chara Dasha"). It au
 
 ## Technique Coverage
 
-Current registry count: **89 techniques** (79 covered, 10 complete, 0 partial, 0 missing).
+Current registry count: **89 capability entries** (79 covered, 10 complete, 0 partial, 0 missing).
+
+These entries are a **backend evidence pool**, not a flat list of 89 user-facing
+prediction sources. Ordinary users see topic-level conclusions and evidence
+summaries. The question-domain router selects a small primary chain, then uses
+supporting indicators only to raise/lower confidence. Audit-only and alias
+entries cannot affect astrological conclusions.
 
 The table below lists representative high-value entries. Treat
 `references/technique_registry.json` as the source of truth for the full
diff --git a/references/technique_registry.json b/references/technique_registry.json
index 6e108dc9..70ed0198 100644
--- a/references/technique_registry.json
+++ b/references/technique_registry.json
@@ -44,7 +44,16 @@
         "modules.chart"
       ],
       "audit_label": "D1/Rashi",
-      "missing_impact": "No reliable static chart basis."
+      "missing_impact": "No reliable static chart basis.",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "d9_navamsa": {
       "name": "D9 / Navamsa",
@@ -68,7 +77,16 @@
         "modules.d9_navamsa_expanded"
       ],
       "audit_label": "D9/Navamsa",
-      "missing_impact": "Inner strength and marriage/dharma layer incomplete."
+      "missing_impact": "Inner strength and marriage/dharma layer incomplete.",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "d10_dasamsa": {
       "name": "D10 / Dasamsa",
@@ -89,7 +107,16 @@
         "modules.varga_full.D10_Dasamsa"
       ],
       "audit_label": "D10/Dasamsa",
-      "missing_impact": "Career-specific varga layer missing; career timing confidence must be capped."
+      "missing_impact": "Career-specific varga layer missing; career timing confidence must be capped.",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "vimshottari_dasha": {
       "name": "Vimshottari Dasha",
@@ -109,7 +136,16 @@
         "modules.dasha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Vimshottari",
-      "missing_impact": "Primary timing layer unavailable."
+      "missing_impact": "Primary timing layer unavailable.",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "ashtottari_dasha": {
       "name": "Ashtottari Dasha / 108年周期",
@@ -129,7 +165,16 @@
         "modules.ashtottari_dasha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Ashtottari",
-      "missing_impact": "Nakshatra-based conditional timing layer unavailable for qualifying charts."
+      "missing_impact": "Nakshatra-based conditional timing layer unavailable for qualifying charts.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "yogini_dasha": {
       "name": "Yogini Dasha / 36年周期",
@@ -149,7 +194,16 @@
         "modules.yogini_dasha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Yogini",
-      "missing_impact": "Yogini Dasha 已可输出，但起运边界、子运切分与传统软件对齐度仍需更多外部 benchmark，细粒度事件定时置信度受限。"
+      "missing_impact": "Yogini Dasha 已可输出，但起运边界、子运切分与传统软件对齐度仍需更多外部 benchmark，细粒度事件定时置信度受限。",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "kalachakra_dasha": {
       "name": "Kalachakra Dasha / 时轮大运",
@@ -170,7 +224,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Kalachakra",
       "missing_impact": "Kalachakra 已可输出 Savya/Apasavya 模式、当前主周期与 Rashi-year 序列，但 classical pada mapping、子运细化与传统软件黑盒对齐仍需继续成熟化。",
-      "limitation": "当前实现已接入 full-reading 与多系统 Dasha convergence，可作为补充 timing 证据使用；但起始 pada 映射与完整传统细则仍为简化版，不能单独承担最终事件定时结论。"
+      "limitation": "当前实现已接入 full-reading 与多系统 Dasha convergence，可作为补充 timing 证据使用；但起始 pada 映射与完整传统细则仍为简化版，不能单独承担最终事件定时结论。",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "dasha_sandhi": {
       "name": "Dasha Sandhi",
@@ -189,7 +252,16 @@
         "modules.dasha_sandhi"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Dasha Sandhi",
-      "missing_impact": "Transition windows may be overstated or understated."
+      "missing_impact": "Transition windows may be overstated or understated.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "jaimini_chara_dasha": {
       "name": "Jaimini / Chara Dasha",
@@ -211,7 +283,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Jaimini/Chara",
       "missing_impact": "Rashi-based timing confirmation provides cross-validation for Vimshottari Dasha, Dasha Sandhi, transit, D10/A10 and Ashtakavarga.",
-      "limitation": "v6.1.12: KN Rao method正式benchmark通过（120/120 sign=100%, 110/120 duration=91.67%, overall=95.83%≥95%）。剩余~4.2%差异来自Aquarius/Scorpio的Rahu/Ketu共主动态判定（PyJHora用_stronger_planet_new完整尊严比较链），当前使用传统宫主(Saturn/Mars)。已记录为未来优化项。Chara Dasha作为标准应期模块可正常使用。"
+      "limitation": "v6.1.12: KN Rao method正式benchmark通过（120/120 sign=100%, 110/120 duration=91.67%, overall=95.83%≥95%）。剩余~4.2%差异来自Aquarius/Scorpio的Rahu/Ketu共主动态判定（PyJHora用_stronger_planet_new完整尊严比较链），当前使用传统宫主(Saturn/Mars)。已记录为未来优化项。Chara Dasha作为标准应期模块可正常使用。",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "karakamsha_ak_amk": {
       "name": "Karakamsha / AK / AmK",
@@ -233,7 +314,16 @@
         "modules.jaimini.karakamsha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "AK/AmK/Karakamsha",
-      "missing_impact": "Jaimini career/soul indicator layer incomplete."
+      "missing_impact": "Jaimini career/soul indicator layer incomplete.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "a10_karma_pada": {
       "name": "A10 / Karma Pada / Rajya Pada",
@@ -253,7 +343,16 @@
         "modules.special_lagnas.A10_Karma_Pada"
       ],
       "audit_label": "A10/Karma Pada",
-      "missing_impact": "Career public-image layer incomplete."
+      "missing_impact": "Career public-image layer incomplete.",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "argala": {
       "name": "Argala",
@@ -274,7 +373,16 @@
         "modules.argala"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Argala",
-      "missing_impact": "Intervention/blocking layer missing."
+      "missing_impact": "Intervention/blocking layer missing.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "badhaka": {
       "name": "Badhaka / Obstacle House-Lord",
@@ -294,7 +402,16 @@
         "scripts/yoga_engine.py:is_badhaka"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Badhaka",
-      "missing_impact": "Obstacle-house logic missing, so blockage, interference and frustration timing are under-modeled."
+      "missing_impact": "Obstacle-house logic missing, so blockage, interference and frustration timing are under-modeled.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "upagraha_gulika_maandi": {
       "name": "Upagraha / Gulika / Maandi",
@@ -317,7 +434,16 @@
         "scripts/prashna.py:calc_gulika_simple"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Upagraha/Gulika/Maandi",
-      "missing_impact": "Sensitive malefic shadow points are unavailable, weakening pressure, delay and vulnerability interpretation."
+      "missing_impact": "Sensitive malefic shadow points are unavailable, weakening pressure, delay and vulnerability interpretation.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "sphuta_trisphuta_family": {
       "name": "Sphuta / Trisphuta / Catusphuta / Pancasphuta / Prana-Deha-Mrityu",
@@ -342,7 +468,16 @@
         "kp_horary.sphutas"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Sphuta/Trisphuta",
-      "missing_impact": "Prashna energy convergence and life-sensitivity markers are absent, leaving horary and life-risk reading thinner than classical toolchains."
+      "missing_impact": "Prashna energy convergence and life-sensitivity markers are absent, leaving horary and life-risk reading thinner than classical toolchains.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "deha_jeeva": {
       "name": "Deha / Jeeva Framework",
@@ -367,7 +502,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Deha/Jeeva",
       "missing_impact": "Without Deha/Jeeva routing, body-vs-consciousness event classification and some classical alternative Dasha judgments stay shallow.",
-      "note": "Current role is primarily interpretive and workflow-level. Keep maturity at covered until more explicit engine-level outputs and external cases are frozen."
+      "note": "Current role is primarily interpretive and workflow-level. Keep maturity at covered until more explicit engine-level outputs and external cases are frozen.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "shadbala": {
       "name": "Shadbala",
@@ -390,7 +534,16 @@
       "missing_impact": "Planetary strength claims are quantitatively anchored only as an internally consistent reference, not as externally calibrated absolute Parashara Shadbala.",
       "limitation": "Round 9 internal invariant benchmark passed 1200/1200 checks and full-reading matches the shadbala command. However scripts/shadbala.py still uses simplified Nathonnata Bala, approximate Saptavargaja sub-vargas, Chesta speed buckets and simplified Drik aspect weights. Use for relative strength ranking with confidence cap until an external full Shadbala table benchmark is frozen.",
       "version": "6.9.3",
-      "note": "v6.9.3 — Sputa Drishti精确相位 + Yuddha Bala + BPHS 1200/1200校准"
+      "note": "v6.9.3 — Sputa Drishti精确相位 + Yuddha Bala + BPHS 1200/1200校准",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "ashtakavarga": {
       "name": "Ashtakavarga",
@@ -411,7 +564,16 @@
         "modules.ashtakavarga"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Ashtakavarga",
-      "missing_impact": "covered: SAV/BAV/PAV/Sodhita/Yoga Pinda are exposed through /api/ashtakavarga and the Skill workbench."
+      "missing_impact": "covered: SAV/BAV/PAV/Sodhita/Yoga Pinda are exposed through /api/ashtakavarga and the Skill workbench.",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "avastha": {
       "name": "Avastha",
@@ -430,7 +592,16 @@
         "modules.avasthas"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Avastha",
-      "missing_impact": "Planet condition/state layer missing."
+      "missing_impact": "Planet condition/state layer missing.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "combustion": {
       "name": "Combustion / Asta",
@@ -452,7 +623,16 @@
         "modules.chart.planets.*.combust"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Combustion",
-      "missing_impact": "Planetary independence vs solar absorption is not tracked, weakening dignity and expression analysis."
+      "missing_impact": "Planetary independence vs solar absorption is not tracked, weakening dignity and expression analysis.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "graha_yuddha": {
       "name": "Graha Yuddha / Planetary War",
@@ -474,7 +654,16 @@
         "scripts/yoga_expansion.py:detect_graha_yuddha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Graha Yuddha",
-      "missing_impact": "Planetary contest and winner-loser dynamics are absent, reducing conflict and strength nuance."
+      "missing_impact": "Planetary contest and winner-loser dynamics are absent, reducing conflict and strength nuance.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "gandanta": {
       "name": "Gandanta",
@@ -495,7 +684,16 @@
         "scripts/yoga_expansion.py:detect_gandanta"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Gandanta",
-      "missing_impact": "Water-fire knot transitions are not surfaced, weakening crisis and karmic transition interpretation."
+      "missing_impact": "Water-fire knot transitions are not surfaced, weakening crisis and karmic transition interpretation.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "moolatrikona": {
       "name": "Moolatrikona / 原始三方",
@@ -520,7 +718,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Moolatrikona",
       "missing_impact": "Without a first-class Moolatrikona layer, dignity ranking, Sthana Bala nuance and several yoga-strength judgments become too coarse.",
-      "note": "Degree-band details vary by lineage. Current skill already uses Moolatrikona in dignity reasoning and strength interpretation, but should keep lineage notes explicit."
+      "note": "Degree-band details vary by lineage. Current skill already uses Moolatrikona in dignity reasoning and strength interpretation, but should keep lineage notes explicit.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "vargottama": {
       "name": "Vargottama",
@@ -539,7 +746,16 @@
         "modules.vargottama"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Vargottama",
-      "missing_impact": "D1-D9 consistency strength may be undercounted."
+      "missing_impact": "D1-D9 consistency strength may be undercounted.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "pushkara": {
       "name": "Pushkara Navamsa / Pushkara Bhaga",
@@ -560,7 +776,16 @@
         "modules.pushkara"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Pushkara",
-      "missing_impact": "D9 grace/support layer may be undercounted."
+      "missing_impact": "D9 grace/support layer may be undercounted.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "shodasavarga": {
       "name": "Shodasavarga / 十六分盘体系",
@@ -584,7 +809,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Shodasavarga",
       "missing_impact": "Without a first-class 16-varga map, divisional interpretation and traditional weighting logic remain fragmented across isolated chart outputs.",
-      "note": "Registry entry covers the traditional 16-varga framework and teaching layer; not a claim that every Vimsopaka weighting path is already fully benchmark-closed."
+      "note": "Registry entry covers the traditional 16-varga framework and teaching layer; not a claim that every Vimsopaka weighting path is already fully benchmark-closed.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "varga_dignity": {
       "name": "Varga Dignity / 分盘尊严等级",
@@ -606,7 +840,16 @@
         "modules.varga_strength_overview"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Varga Dignity",
-      "missing_impact": "Without a first-class Varga Dignity entry, Simhasana/Parijata/Shridhama-style honor ladders remain buried inside divisional doctrine and are easy to omit in deep reading."
+      "missing_impact": "Without a first-class Varga Dignity entry, Simhasana/Parijata/Shridhama-style honor ladders remain buried inside divisional doctrine and are easy to omit in deep reading.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "vimsopaka_bala": {
       "name": "Vimsopaka Bala / 分盘综合力量",
@@ -630,7 +873,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Vimsopaka Bala",
       "missing_impact": "Without Vimsopaka Bala, cross-varga strength synthesis stays under-modeled, weakening Dasha-lord judgment and deep divisional confidence calibration.",
-      "note": "Keep maturity at covered: the interpretive layer and reference doctrine exist, but external benchmark closure for all weighting schemes is still incomplete."
+      "note": "Keep maturity at covered: the interpretive layer and reference doctrine exist, but external benchmark closure for all weighting schemes is still incomplete.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "navamsa_64th": {
       "name": "64th Navamsa / Chatushashti Navamsa",
@@ -651,7 +903,16 @@
         "scripts.varga.calc_64th_navamsa"
       ],
       "audit_label": "64th Navamsa",
-      "missing_impact": "A classical stress-sensitive Navamsa trigger is unavailable, weakening vulnerability and event-pressure analysis."
+      "missing_impact": "A classical stress-sensitive Navamsa trigger is unavailable, weakening vulnerability and event-pressure analysis.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "drekkana_22nd": {
       "name": "22nd Drekkana",
@@ -672,7 +933,16 @@
         "scripts.varga.calc_22nd_drekkana"
       ],
       "audit_label": "22nd Drekkana",
-      "missing_impact": "A classical danger-sensitive Drekkana trigger is absent, weakening accident and adversity screening."
+      "missing_impact": "A classical danger-sensitive Drekkana trigger is absent, weakening accident and adversity screening.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "bhrigu_bindu": {
       "name": "Bhrigu Bindu",
@@ -693,7 +963,16 @@
         "scripts.varga.calc_bhrigu_bindu"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Bhrigu Bindu",
-      "missing_impact": "A commonly used Moon-Rahu destiny trigger is unavailable, weakening event-sensitive reading depth."
+      "missing_impact": "A commonly used Moon-Rahu destiny trigger is unavailable, weakening event-sensitive reading depth.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "sarpa_drekkana": {
       "name": "Sarpa Drekkana",
@@ -714,7 +993,16 @@
         "scripts.varga.calc_sarpa_drekkana"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Sarpa Drekkana",
-      "missing_impact": "A classical toxic-crisis Drekkana marker is absent, thinning advanced risk and temperament screening."
+      "missing_impact": "A classical toxic-crisis Drekkana marker is absent, thinning advanced risk and temperament screening.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "bhava_chalit": {
       "name": "Bhava Chalit",
@@ -737,7 +1025,16 @@
       "missing_impact": "covered",
       "limitation": "Complete in v6.9.13: house cusps, Bhava Sandhi boundaries, planet reassignment, Rashi-vs-Bhava shift detection.",
       "version": "6.9.13",
-      "note": "v6.9.13 — bhava_chalit.py 完整行星重分配 + cross_house_check"
+      "note": "v6.9.13 — bhava_chalit.py 完整行星重分配 + cross_house_check",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "sudarshana_chakra": {
       "name": "Sudarshana Chakra",
@@ -761,7 +1058,16 @@
       "missing_impact": "covered",
       "limitation": "Complete in v6.9.14: traditional triple-lagna confirmation with Ascendant/Moon/Sun reference charts and life-area convergence scoring.",
       "version": "6.9.14",
-      "note": "v6.9.14 — sudarshana_chakra.py 三参考点盘(Lagna+Chandra+Surya) + 收敛分析"
+      "note": "v6.9.14 — sudarshana_chakra.py 三参考点盘(Lagna+Chandra+Surya) + 收敛分析",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "dispositor_chain": {
       "name": "Dispositor Chain / 定位星链",
@@ -782,7 +1088,16 @@
         "modules.final_dispositors"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Dispositor Chain",
-      "missing_impact": "Planet energy flow / final dispositor analysis incomplete."
+      "missing_impact": "Planet energy flow / final dispositor analysis incomplete.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "inter_chart_linkage": {
       "name": "Inter-chart Linkage / 分盘间飞星",
@@ -802,7 +1117,16 @@
         "modules.inter_chart_linkage"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Inter-chart Linkage",
-      "missing_impact": "Cross-chart planet linkage (D1->D9->D10) analysis incomplete."
+      "missing_impact": "Cross-chart planet linkage (D1->D9->D10) analysis incomplete.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "tajika_yogas": {
       "name": "Tajika Yogas / 年运盘格局",
@@ -823,7 +1147,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Tajika Yogas",
       "missing_impact": "Tajika year-chart yoga detection incomplete; annual timing confidence capped.",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — 10种年度Yoga完整检测(Itasala/Ishkavala/Vasala/Tambira/Kambira/Dakshina/Vama/Ubhaya/Vedha/Kuta)+Radda+Tajika容许度+Vedha敏感点表+经典相位规则"
+      "note": "v7.0 — 10种年度Yoga完整检测(Itasala/Ishkavala/Vasala/Tambira/Kambira/Dakshina/Vama/Ubhaya/Vedha/Kuta)+Radda+Tajika容许度+Vedha敏感点表+经典相位规则",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "sahams": {
       "name": "Sahams / 特殊点",
@@ -845,7 +1178,16 @@
       "missing_impact": "Sahams 已有输出，但 Tajika/事件定时里的解释层仍应作为辅助证据，不能单独承担精确落点结论。",
       "limitation": "Sahams 当前已扩展到 36 个常见点位，但解释层、权重口径与传统软件黑盒一致性仍未完成系统外部对标，不宜单独作为精确事件定位依据。",
       "version": "6.9.3",
-      "note": "v6.9.3 — tajika.py 从 7 扩展到 36 种 Saham（含 Putra/Jnana/Moksha/Dhan/Maya 等），但解释成熟度仍以 covered 管理"
+      "note": "v6.9.3 — tajika.py 从 7 扩展到 36 种 Saham（含 Putra/Jnana/Moksha/Dhan/Maya 等），但解释成熟度仍以 covered 管理",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "darakaraka": {
       "name": "Darakaraka (DK) / 配偶星",
@@ -868,7 +1210,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Darakaraka (DK)",
       "missing_impact": "Marriage/partner analysis incomplete without DK.",
-      "validation_note": "v6.1.10 wires scripts/darakaraka_reader.py into full-reading and thematic reports; output includes DK planet/sign/house, D9 dignity, conjunctions, quality score and narrative."
+      "validation_note": "v6.1.10 wires scripts/darakaraka_reader.py into full-reading and thematic reports; output includes DK planet/sign/house, D9 dignity, conjunctions, quality score and narrative.",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "raj_yoga": {
       "name": "Raj Yoga / 王者瑜伽",
@@ -888,7 +1239,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Raj Yoga",
       "missing_impact": "Power/status timing confidence capped without Raj Yoga detection.",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — 5种Raj Yoga(双重宫主/同宫/互看/互容/Viparita)+角宫主×三方宫主完整组合+dashaflow参考对齐"
+      "note": "v7.0 — 5种Raj Yoga(双重宫主/同宫/互看/互容/Viparita)+角宫主×三方宫主完整组合+dashaflow参考对齐",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "dhana_yoga": {
       "name": "Dhana Yoga / 财富瑜伽",
@@ -908,7 +1268,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Dhana Yoga",
       "missing_impact": "Wealth timing confidence capped without Dhana Yoga.",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — 5种Dhana Yoga(2+11宫主强/5+9宫主/2+9宫主/11+9宫主/财富宫主+吉星)+dashaflow参考对齐"
+      "note": "v7.0 — 5种Dhana Yoga(2+11宫主强/5+9宫主/2+9宫主/11+9宫主/财富宫主+吉星)+dashaflow参考对齐",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "solar_lunar_yogas": {
       "name": "Solar/Lunar Yogas (Veshi/Voshi/Ubhayachari/Sunapha/Anapha/Durudhura)",
@@ -928,7 +1297,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Solar/Lunar Yogas",
       "missing_impact": "Solar/Lunar Yogas not detected.",
-      "limitation": "Restored from Git dangling commit f19369c. Algorithm-based detection in yoga_engine.py."
+      "limitation": "Restored from Git dangling commit f19369c. Algorithm-based detection in yoga_engine.py.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "pancha_mahapurusha": {
       "name": "Pancha Mahapurusha Yoga / 五王瑜伽",
@@ -949,7 +1327,16 @@
       "missing_impact": "Personality strength assessment incomplete.",
       "limitation": "五王瑜伽（Ruchaka、Bhadra 等）检测基于基础规则，但未完整覆盖所有变体条件（如燃烧、逆行、受克时的 Yoga 失效条件）。与 PyJHora 的 284 种瑜伽体系对齐度未经验证。只能作为人格特质的辅助参考。",
       "version": "6.9.3",
-      "note": "v6.9.3 — pancha_mahapurusha.py 5Yoga + 4层失效条件(燃烧/逆行/受克/Navamsa)"
+      "note": "v6.9.3 — pancha_mahapurusha.py 5Yoga + 4层失效条件(燃烧/逆行/受克/Navamsa)",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "nicha_bhanga_raj": {
       "name": "Neecha Bhanga Raj Yoga / 落陷解除王者瑜伽",
@@ -969,7 +1356,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Neecha Bhanga",
       "missing_impact": "Debilitation recovery analysis incomplete.",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — 6种解除条件(dispositor在Lagna角宫/Moon角宫+擢升星主在角宫+互容+Navamsa入庙)+量化解除程度+dashaflow参考对齐"
+      "note": "v7.0 — 6种解除条件(dispositor在Lagna角宫/Moon角宫+擢升星主在角宫+互容+Navamsa入庙)+量化解除程度+dashaflow参考对齐",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "neechabhanga": {
       "name": "Neechabhanga / 落陷取消（别名入口）",
@@ -991,7 +1387,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Neechabhanga",
       "missing_impact": "Debilitation cancellation logic becomes harder to discover when users ask with the common spelling only.",
-      "note": "Alias entry to keep common terminology aligned with nicha_bhanga_raj. Do not interpret this alias as a separate extra technique."
+      "note": "Alias entry to keep common terminology aligned with nicha_bhanga_raj. Do not interpret this alias as a separate extra technique.",
+      "entry_type": "alias_entry",
+      "evidence_role": "alias",
+      "user_visibility": "hidden",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "not_applicable",
+        "rule": "not_applicable",
+        "prediction": "not_applicable"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Alias/discoverability entry only; it must not be counted as an independent prediction source."
     },
     "mangal_dosha": {
       "name": "Mangal Dosha / 火星煞",
@@ -1009,7 +1414,16 @@
         "modules.yogas_doshas.mangal_dosha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Mangal Dosha",
-      "missing_impact": "Marriage difficulty assessment incomplete without Mangal Dosha."
+      "missing_impact": "Marriage difficulty assessment incomplete without Mangal Dosha.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "kaal_sarp_dosha": {
       "name": "Kaal Sarp Dosha / 时间蛇煞",
@@ -1027,7 +1441,16 @@
         "modules.yogas_doshas.kaal_sarp_dosha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Kaal Sarp Dosha",
-      "missing_impact": "Obstacle analysis incomplete without Kaal Sarp."
+      "missing_impact": "Obstacle analysis incomplete without Kaal Sarp.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "pitra_dosha": {
       "name": "Pitra Dosha / 父辈煞",
@@ -1045,7 +1468,16 @@
         "modules.yogas_doshas.pitra_dosha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Pitra Dosha",
-      "missing_impact": "Ancestor karma analysis incomplete."
+      "missing_impact": "Ancestor karma analysis incomplete.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "sade_sati": {
       "name": "Sade Sati / 土星七年",
@@ -1066,7 +1498,16 @@
       "missing_impact": "Saturn pressure timing incomplete.",
       "limitation": "Sade Sati 当前按土星经过月亮前后星座的简化模型计算，未完整覆盖全部影响条件（如土星在 Kendra 时的强度变化、Ashtakavarga 对 Sade Sati 的修正、Kantaka Shani 细分阶段）。压力程度评估为近似值，不宜作为精确事件预测依据。",
       "version": "6.9.3",
-      "note": "v6.9.3 — sade_sati.py 三阶段(Rising/Peak/Setting) + Kantaka Shani"
+      "note": "v6.9.3 — sade_sati.py 三阶段(Rising/Peak/Setting) + Kantaka Shani",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "arudha_lagna": {
       "name": "Arudha Lagna (AL) / 镜像上升",
@@ -1084,7 +1525,16 @@
         "modules.yogas_doshas.arudha_lagna"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Arudha Lagna",
-      "missing_impact": "Public image analysis incomplete without AL."
+      "missing_impact": "Public image analysis incomplete without AL.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "upapada_lagna": {
       "name": "Upapada Lagna (UL) / 配偶镜像上升",
@@ -1102,7 +1552,16 @@
         "modules.yogas_doshas.upapada_lagna"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Upapada Lagna",
-      "missing_impact": "Marriage quality analysis incomplete without UL."
+      "missing_impact": "Marriage quality analysis incomplete without UL.",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "special_lagnas_extended": {
       "name": "Special Lagnas / HL GL VL PP ViL",
@@ -1128,7 +1587,16 @@
         "special_lagnas.ViL"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Special Lagnas",
-      "missing_impact": "Special Lagna timing, status and prosperity sub-angles are thinner without HL/GL/VL/PP/ViL."
+      "missing_impact": "Special Lagna timing, status and prosperity sub-angles are thinner without HL/GL/VL/PP/ViL.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "special_lagnas": {
       "name": "Special Lagnas / 特殊上升点（别名入口）",
@@ -1156,7 +1624,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Special Lagnas",
       "missing_impact": "Important prosperity/status/timing sub-ascendants become harder to discover when users ask for special lagnas by the common umbrella term.",
-      "note": "Alias entry aligned to special_lagnas_extended; not a separate additional calculation family."
+      "note": "Alias entry aligned to special_lagnas_extended; not a separate additional calculation family.",
+      "entry_type": "alias_entry",
+      "evidence_role": "alias",
+      "user_visibility": "hidden",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "not_applicable",
+        "rule": "not_applicable",
+        "prediction": "not_applicable"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Alias/discoverability entry only; it must not be counted as an independent prediction source."
     },
     "tithi_lord": {
       "name": "Tithi Lord / 月日守护星",
@@ -1177,7 +1654,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Tithi Lord",
       "missing_impact": "Tithi Lord 分析不完整，Prashna 问卜时机判断受限。",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — 完整30个Tithi名称+5类分类(Nanda/Bhadra/Jaya/Rikta/Purna)+适忌活动表+落宫强度评估+Prashna分类匹配+jyotishganit参考对齐"
+      "note": "v7.0 — 完整30个Tithi名称+5类分类(Nanda/Bhadra/Jaya/Rikta/Purna)+适忌活动表+落宫强度评估+Prashna分类匹配+jyotishganit参考对齐",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "pancha_pakshi": {
       "name": "Pancha Pakshi / 五鸟系统",
@@ -1198,7 +1684,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Pancha Pakshi",
       "missing_impact": "Pancha Pakshi 已可输出基础鸟态与活动矩阵，但 Tamil 传统时机细则、地域化口径与真实案例闭环仍不足，结论应保留成熟度边界。",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — 已实现 5x5 活动矩阵、星期 Yama 偏移、鸟间相克互动与 weekday 参数支持；输出可用但整体成熟度仍按 covered 管理"
+      "note": "v7.0 — 已实现 5x5 活动矩阵、星期 Yama 偏移、鸟间相克互动与 weekday 参数支持；输出可用但整体成熟度仍按 covered 管理",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "rashi_tulya_navamsa": {
       "name": "Rashi Tulya Navamsa / 本命对分盘分析",
@@ -1224,7 +1719,16 @@
       "limitation": "Rashi Tulya Navamsa 分析当前基于 D1 与 D9 同宫行星的简单对比，未完整覆盖所有变体条件（如行星在 D9 中的精确度数对比、Vargottama 与非 Vargottama 的混合情况）。婚姻和内在潜力的深度解读应结合更多分盘（D7、D12）交叉验证。",
       "validation_note": "v6.1.10 exposes RTN evidence to thematic reports: relationship mapping, curse-yoga warnings and Guna balance are injected from modules.rashi_tulya_navamsa.",
       "version": "6.9.3",
-      "note": "v6.9.3 — 已接入 full-reading 流程"
+      "note": "v6.9.3 — 已接入 full-reading 流程",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "marriage_counting": {
       "name": "Marriage Counting Method / 婚姻计数法",
@@ -1247,7 +1751,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Marriage Counting",
       "missing_impact": "婚姻数量判断不完整，关系模式分析受限。",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — Parivartana自动重算(原TODO已实现)+D9完整评估(Venus/Mars/Jupiter/7宫主/Rahu-Ketu)+每段关系质量预测+5级评级系统"
+      "note": "v7.0 — Parivartana自动重算(原TODO已实现)+D9完整评估(Venus/Mars/Jupiter/7宫主/Rahu-Ketu)+每段关系质量预测+5级评级系统",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "trimshamsa_d30": {
       "name": "Trimshamsa D30 / 三十分盘",
@@ -1270,7 +1783,16 @@
       "audit_label": "D30 Trimshamsa",
       "missing_impact": "D30 灾难分析不完整，危机事件判断受限。",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — Parashara经典规则修正(奇偶星座分区法,非简单30等分循环)+D30宫位推算+行星状态分析+凶星集中度分析+完整婚姻危机评估+jyotishganit参考对齐"
+      "note": "v7.0 — Parashara经典规则修正(奇偶星座分区法,非简单30等分循环)+D30宫位推算+行星状态分析+凶星集中度分析+完整婚姻危机评估+jyotishganit参考对齐",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "muntha": {
       "name": "Muntha / 年运之主 (Tajika)",
@@ -1291,7 +1813,16 @@
         "modules.muntha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Muntha",
-      "missing_impact": "Varshaphala 年运盘核心指标缺失，年度主题判断受限。"
+      "missing_impact": "Varshaphala 年运盘核心指标缺失，年度主题判断受限。",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "solar_return": {
       "name": "Solar Return / Varshaphala (Tajika)",
@@ -1314,7 +1845,16 @@
         "modules.muntha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Solar Return Varshaphala",
-      "missing_impact": "Varshaphala/Tajika 已可输出年盘骨架、Muntha、Mudda Dasha 与年度 Yoga，但年度事件裁决深度与 Saham 权重仍需继续闭环。"
+      "missing_impact": "Varshaphala/Tajika 已可输出年盘骨架、Muntha、Mudda Dasha 与年度 Yoga，但年度事件裁决深度与 Saham 权重仍需继续闭环。",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "prashna_integration": {
       "name": "Prashna Integration / 问事占星接入",
@@ -1335,7 +1875,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Prashna Integration",
       "missing_impact": "Prashna 已接入 full-reading，但问事分支的传统判断链、时机裁决与外部实盘闭环仍不均匀。",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — KP Sublord完整3层判定(Star/Sub/Sub-Sub)+Nadi Prashna(Moon-Jupiter角度)+Sphuta(Gulika/Yamaghantaka)+时机评分系统+dashaflow/jyotishganit参考对齐"
+      "note": "v7.0 — KP Sublord完整3层判定(Star/Sub/Sub-Sub)+Nadi Prashna(Moon-Jupiter角度)+Sphuta(Gulika/Yamaghantaka)+时机评分系统+dashaflow/jyotishganit参考对齐",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "bhrigu_pada_dasha": {
       "name": "Bhrigu Pada Dasha / 足步推进法",
@@ -1358,7 +1907,16 @@
       "audit_label": "Bhrigu Pada Dasha",
       "missing_impact": "Bhrigu 足步推进法缺失，婚姻时机精确预测受限（通用近似版已实现）。",
       "version": "7.0",
-      "note": "v7.0 — BCP自然周期法完整实现+完整Dasha序列(0-80岁)+Nakshatra级推进+多行星推进+Vimshottari交叉验证接口+D9完整验证(含Venus质量评估)"
+      "note": "v7.0 — BCP自然周期法完整实现+完整Dasha序列(0-80岁)+Nakshatra级推进+多行星推进+Vimshottari交叉验证接口+D9完整验证(含Venus质量评估)",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "narayana_dasha": {
       "name": "Narayana Dasha (Rishi Dasha / Padakrama Dasha)",
@@ -1380,7 +1938,16 @@
         "modules.narayana_dasha"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Narayana Dasha",
-      "missing_impact": "Narayana Dasha 已可输出主序列，但不同传统口径、解释层权重与外部黑盒对标仍需继续沉淀。"
+      "missing_impact": "Narayana Dasha 已可输出主序列，但不同传统口径、解释层权重与外部黑盒对标仍需继续沉淀。",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "muhurta": {
       "name": "Muhurta (Panchanga / Auspicious Timing)",
@@ -1405,7 +1972,16 @@
         "modules.muhurta"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Muhurta",
-      "missing_impact": "Muhurta 已可运行，但复杂活动类型、长时间窗筛选和传统择时解释层仍需继续扩深。"
+      "missing_impact": "Muhurta 已可运行，但复杂活动类型、长时间窗筛选和传统择时解释层仍需继续扩深。",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "nakshatra_advanced": {
       "name": "Nakshatra Advanced / 星宿进阶（Tara Bala + Chandra Bala + Sub-Lord）",
@@ -1434,7 +2010,16 @@
         "modules.nakshatra_advanced.tara_chandra_combined"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Nakshatra Advanced",
-      "missing_impact": "N/A - implemented in v6.0.22"
+      "missing_impact": "N/A - implemented in v6.0.22",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "tara_bala": {
       "name": "Tara Bala / Tarabala / 星宿力",
@@ -1460,7 +2045,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Tara Bala",
       "missing_impact": "Without a first-class Tara Bala entry, personalized Muhurta filtering and Nakshatra-based caution windows stay hidden behind generic Nakshatra outputs.",
-      "note": "This is a first-class view over the existing Nakshatra Advanced layer, not a claim that every Navatara branch has already been benchmark-closed."
+      "note": "This is a first-class view over the existing Nakshatra Advanced layer, not a claim that every Navatara branch has already been benchmark-closed.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "chandra_bala": {
       "name": "Chandra Bala / 月亮力",
@@ -1484,7 +2078,16 @@
         "modules.nakshatra_advanced.tara_chandra_combined"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Chandra Bala",
-      "missing_impact": "Without a first-class Chandra Bala entry, Moon-relative suitability and emotional timing filters remain hidden behind a generic advanced Nakshatra surface."
+      "missing_impact": "Without a first-class Chandra Bala entry, Moon-relative suitability and emotional timing filters remain hidden behind a generic advanced Nakshatra surface.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "navatara": {
       "name": "Navatara / 九星链",
@@ -1509,7 +2112,16 @@
       ],
       "audit_label": "Navatara",
       "missing_impact": "Without a first-class Navatara entry, 27-star three-cycle grouping remains invisible in the skill map even when related Tara layers already exist.",
-      "note": "Current maturity reflects doctrinal and workflow coverage; treat as covered until a dedicated structured Navatara output surface is frozen."
+      "note": "Current maturity reflects doctrinal and workflow coverage; treat as covered until a dedicated structured Navatara output surface is frozen.",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "nakshatra_dasha": {
       "name": "Nakshatra Dasha / 星宿大运推演（Ashtottari + Nakshatra-level Vimshottari）",
@@ -1537,7 +2149,16 @@
         "modules.nakshatra_dasha.transit_overlay"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Nakshatra Dasha",
-      "missing_impact": "N/A - implemented in v6.0.22"
+      "missing_impact": "N/A - implemented in v6.0.22",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "kp_system": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1555,7 +2176,16 @@
         "scripts/kp_system.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "kp_system.py",
-      "missing_impact": "KP 已可输出 Sublord/Subsublord/ABCD significator，但 ruling planets、horary workflow、事件裁决口径与传统工作流细节仍需更多外部案例闭环。"
+      "missing_impact": "KP 已可输出 Sublord/Subsublord/ABCD significator，但 ruling planets、horary workflow、事件裁决口径与传统工作流细节仍需更多外部案例闭环。",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "prashna": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1573,7 +2203,16 @@
         "scripts/prashna.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "prashna.py",
-      "missing_impact": "Prashna 已可运行，且已有 KP 证据层、Arudha、Sphuta 与 timing score，但不同问事分支的传统判断链、时机裁决与实盘命中率仍需继续通过外部案例收敛。"
+      "missing_impact": "Prashna 已可运行，且已有 KP 证据层、Arudha、Sphuta 与 timing score，但不同问事分支的传统判断链、时机裁决与实盘命中率仍需继续通过外部案例收敛。",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "synastry_16factor": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1591,7 +2230,16 @@
         "scripts/synastry.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "synastry.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "remedies": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1610,7 +2258,16 @@
         "scripts/remedies.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "remedies.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "workflow_or_engineering",
+      "evidence_role": "audit_only",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "not_applicable",
+        "rule": "not_applicable",
+        "prediction": "not_applicable"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Engineering, correction, or remedial support only; it cannot decide astrological conclusions."
     },
     "bhava_bala": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1629,7 +2286,16 @@
         "scripts/bhava_bala.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "bhava_bala.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "muhurtha": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1647,7 +2313,16 @@
         "scripts/muhurtha_election.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "muhurtha_election.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "alias_entry",
+      "evidence_role": "alias",
+      "user_visibility": "hidden",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "not_applicable",
+        "rule": "not_applicable",
+        "prediction": "not_applicable"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Alias/discoverability entry only; it must not be counted as an independent prediction source."
     },
     "career_engine": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1665,7 +2340,16 @@
         "scripts/career_analysis.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "career_analysis.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "relationship_engine": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1683,7 +2367,16 @@
         "scripts/relationship_analysis.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "relationship_analysis.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "varshaphala": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1703,7 +2396,16 @@
         "scripts/varshaphala.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "varshaphala.py",
-      "missing_impact": "Varshaphala/Tajika 已可输出年盘骨架、Muntha 与年度 Yoga，但 Saham 权重、年度事件裁决和传统软件逐项对齐仍需继续闭环。"
+      "missing_impact": "Varshaphala/Tajika 已可输出年盘骨架、Muntha 与年度 Yoga，但 Saham 权重、年度事件裁决和传统软件逐项对齐仍需继续闭环。",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "case_validated_partial"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "ashtakavarga_pav": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1722,7 +2424,16 @@
         "scripts/ashtakavarga.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "ashtakavarga.py calc_prastara_av()",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "ashtakavarga_sodhita": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1741,7 +2452,16 @@
         "scripts/ashtakavarga.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "ashtakavarga.py calc_sodhita_av()",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "ashtakavarga_yoga_pinda": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1762,7 +2482,16 @@
         "/api/ashtakavarga.yoga_pinda_summary"
       ],
       "audit_label": "ashtakavarga.py calc_yoga_pinda()",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "kakshya": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1780,7 +2509,16 @@
         "scripts/kakshya.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "kakshya.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "supporting_indicator",
+      "evidence_role": "secondary",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Supporting evidence only; it can raise/lower confidence but cannot by itself decide an event or timing claim."
     },
     "transit_trigger": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1798,7 +2536,16 @@
         "scripts/transit_trigger.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "transit_trigger.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "core_technique",
+      "evidence_role": "primary",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "verified",
+        "rule": "verified",
+        "prediction": "support_only"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "May participate in a domain primary chain; do not use as a single-factor conclusion."
     },
     "divisional_yoga": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1816,7 +2563,16 @@
         "scripts/divisional_yoga.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "divisional_yoga.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "deep_varga_avastha": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1843,7 +2599,16 @@
         "/api/deep_varga_avastha.report.deep_varga_templates"
       ],
       "audit_label": "Deep Varga Avastha",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "birth_time_rectifier": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1861,7 +2626,16 @@
         "scripts/birth_time_rectifier.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "birth_time_rectifier.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "composite_adjudicator",
+      "evidence_role": "context",
+      "user_visibility": "ordinary_topic_router",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "partial",
+        "rule": "partial",
+        "prediction": "not_claimed"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Composite route: it may organize evidence, but final conclusions require the domain primary chain and conflict checks."
     },
     "case_validator": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1879,7 +2653,16 @@
         "scripts/case_validator.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "case_validator.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "workflow_or_engineering",
+      "evidence_role": "audit_only",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "not_applicable",
+        "rule": "not_applicable",
+        "prediction": "not_applicable"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Engineering, correction, or remedial support only; it cannot decide astrological conclusions."
     },
     "misconceptions": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1898,7 +2681,16 @@
         "scripts/misconceptions.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "misconceptions.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "workflow_or_engineering",
+      "evidence_role": "audit_only",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "not_applicable",
+        "rule": "not_applicable",
+        "prediction": "not_applicable"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Engineering, correction, or remedial support only; it cannot decide astrological conclusions."
     },
     "thematic_report_orchestrator": {
       "status": "covered",
@@ -1923,7 +2715,16 @@
         "scripts/orchestrator_bridge.py"
       ],
       "audit_label": "report_orchestrator.py",
-      "missing_impact": "covered"
+      "missing_impact": "covered",
+      "entry_type": "workflow_or_engineering",
+      "evidence_role": "audit_only",
+      "user_visibility": "expert_audit",
+      "verification_level": {
+        "calculation": "not_applicable",
+        "rule": "not_applicable",
+        "prediction": "not_applicable"
+      },
+      "conclusion_policy": "Engineering, correction, or remedial support only; it cannot decide astrological conclusions."
     }
   },
   "routes": {
@@ -2084,5 +2885,16 @@
         "sudarshana_chakra"
       ]
     }
+  },
+  "registry_role": "backend_capability_evidence_pool",
+  "public_label": "89 capability entries",
+  "ordinary_user_policy": "Users see topic-level conclusions; the question-domain router selects a small evidence chain from this backend capability evidence pool.",
+  "conclusion_policy": {
+    "primary_chain_required": true,
+    "all_89_entries_must_not_be_flattened_into_conclusions": true,
+    "supporting_entries_can_only_raise_or_lower_confidence": true,
+    "audit_only_entries_cannot_affect_astrological_conclusions": true,
+    "conflicts_must_downgrade_confidence": true,
+    "prediction_requires_past_case_or_birth_time_rectification": true
   }
 }
diff --git a/scripts/capability_evidence_pool.py b/scripts/capability_evidence_pool.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..06899047
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripts/capability_evidence_pool.py
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Summarize the technique registry as a backend capability evidence pool."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import json
+from collections import Counter
+from pathlib import Path
+from typing import Any
+
+
+ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
+DEFAULT_REGISTRY = ROOT / "references" / "technique_registry.json"
+
+
+def load_registry(path: Path = DEFAULT_REGISTRY) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    return json.loads(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
+
+
+def build_capability_evidence_pool_summary(registry: dict[str, Any] | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    registry = registry if registry is not None else load_registry()
+    techniques = registry.get("techniques") if isinstance(registry, dict) else {}
+    if not isinstance(techniques, dict):
+        techniques = {}
+
+    entry_type_counts = Counter()
+    evidence_role_counts = Counter()
+    visibility_counts = Counter()
+    prediction_counts = Counter()
+    primary_entries: list[str] = []
+    audit_only_entries: list[str] = []
+    alias_entries: list[str] = []
+
+    for tech_id, tech in techniques.items():
+        if not isinstance(tech, dict):
+            continue
+        entry_type = tech.get("entry_type") or "supporting_indicator"
+        evidence_role = tech.get("evidence_role") or "secondary"
+        visibility = tech.get("user_visibility") or "expert_audit"
+        verification = tech.get("verification_level") if isinstance(tech.get("verification_level"), dict) else {}
+        prediction = verification.get("prediction") or "not_claimed"
+
+        entry_type_counts[entry_type] += 1
+        evidence_role_counts[evidence_role] += 1
+        visibility_counts[visibility] += 1
+        prediction_counts[prediction] += 1
+
+        if evidence_role == "primary":
+            primary_entries.append(tech_id)
+        elif evidence_role == "audit_only":
+            audit_only_entries.append(tech_id)
+        elif evidence_role == "alias":
+            alias_entries.append(tech_id)
+
+    return {
+        "scope": "backend_capability_evidence_pool",
+        "total_entries": len(techniques),
+        "public_label": registry.get("public_label", f"{len(techniques)} capability entries"),
+        "ordinary_user_policy": registry.get(
+            "ordinary_user_policy",
+            "Users see topic-level conclusions; capability entries are routed behind the scenes.",
+        ),
+        "entry_type_counts": dict(sorted(entry_type_counts.items())),
+        "evidence_role_counts": dict(sorted(evidence_role_counts.items())),
+        "user_visibility_counts": dict(sorted(visibility_counts.items())),
+        "prediction_verification_counts": dict(sorted(prediction_counts.items())),
+        "primary_entries": sorted(primary_entries),
+        "audit_only_entries": sorted(audit_only_entries),
+        "alias_entries": sorted(alias_entries),
+        "conclusion_policy": {
+            "primary_chain_required": True,
+            "all_89_entries_must_not_be_flattened_into_conclusions": True,
+            "supporting_entries_can_only_raise_or_lower_confidence": True,
+            "audit_only_entries_cannot_affect_astrological_conclusions": True,
+            "conflicts_must_downgrade_confidence": True,
+        },
+    }
+
+
+def main(argv: list[str] | None = None) -> int:
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
+    parser.add_argument("--registry", default=str(DEFAULT_REGISTRY))
+    parser.add_argument("--format", choices=["json"], default="json")
+    args = parser.parse_args(argv)
+
+    summary = build_capability_evidence_pool_summary(load_registry(Path(args.registry)))
+    print(json.dumps(summary, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2, sort_keys=True))
+    return 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    raise SystemExit(main())
diff --git a/scripts/guided_topic_discovery.py b/scripts/guided_topic_discovery.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9f8fe859
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripts/guided_topic_discovery.py
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Evidence-backed topic discovery for ordinary users.
+
+This layer does not calculate astrology. It ranks existing full-reading
+evidence into a small set of next topics a user can tap or ask about.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from typing import Any
+
+
+def _as_dict(value: Any) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    return value if isinstance(value, dict) else {}
+
+
+def _as_list(value: Any) -> list[Any]:
+    return value if isinstance(value, list) else []
+
+
+def _current_dasha(modules: dict[str, Any]) -> tuple[str | None, str | None, str | None, str | None]:
+    dasha = _as_dict(modules.get("dasha"))
+    current = _as_dict(dasha.get("current_dasha"))
+    antar = _as_dict(current.get("antardasha"))
+    return current.get("lord"), antar.get("lord"), current.get("start"), current.get("end")
+
+
+def _convergence_for(modules: dict[str, Any], *tokens: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    convergence = _as_dict(modules.get("dasa_convergence"))
+    activations = _as_dict(convergence.get("domain_activations"))
+    for domain, row in activations.items():
+        if any(token in str(domain).lower() for token in tokens):
+            found = dict(_as_dict(row))
+            found.setdefault("domain", domain)
+            return found
+    for row in _as_list(convergence.get("top_convergent_domains")):
+        if isinstance(row, dict) and any(token in str(row.get("domain", "")).lower() for token in tokens):
+            return row
+        if isinstance(row, (list, tuple)) and row and any(token in str(row[0]).lower() for token in tokens):
+            return {"domain": row[0], "convergence_level": row[1] if len(row) > 1 else None}
+    return {}
+
+
+def _vedastro_snapshot(modules: dict[str, Any], domain: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    overview = _as_dict(modules.get("vedastro_range_scan_result"))
+    metadata = _as_dict(overview.get("source_metadata"))
+    counts = _as_dict(metadata.get("domain_event_counts"))
+    statuses = _as_dict(metadata.get("domain_statuses"))
+    top = _as_dict(overview.get("top_events_by_domain")).get(domain)
+    status = statuses.get(domain) or overview.get("status")
+    event_count = int(counts.get(domain) or 0)
+    if status == "ok" or event_count:
+        return {
+            "status": "used",
+            "domain": domain,
+            "event_count": event_count,
+            "top_event": top if isinstance(top, dict) else None,
+            "source": "modules.vedastro_range_scan_result",
+        }
+    return {
+        "status": "blocked" if overview else "not_available",
+        "domain": domain,
+        "event_count": event_count,
+        "top_event": None,
+        "source": "modules.vedastro_range_scan_result",
+    }
+
+
+def _evidence_line(label: str, value: Any) -> dict[str, str]:
+    return {"label": label, "value": str(value)}
+
+
+def _topic(
+    *,
+    topic_id: str,
+    title: str,
+    reality_value: str,
+    why: str,
+    evidence: list[dict[str, str]],
+    confidence: str,
+    vedastro: dict[str, Any],
+    questions: list[str],
+    answer_mode: str = "tap_or_ask",
+    priority: int = 50,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    return {
+        "id": topic_id,
+        "title": title,
+        "reality_value": reality_value,
+        "why_worth_exploring": why,
+        "evidence": evidence,
+        "confidence": confidence,
+        "vedastro": vedastro,
+        "suggested_questions": questions,
+        "answer_mode": answer_mode,
+        "priority": priority,
+    }
+
+
+def build_guided_topics(report: dict[str, Any]) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
+    modules = _as_dict(report.get("modules"))
+    chart = _as_dict(report.get("chart") or modules.get("chart"))
+    planets = _as_dict(chart.get("planets"))
+    md, ad, md_start, md_end = _current_dasha(modules)
+    md_label = f"{md or '-'} / {ad or '-'}"
+    fbm = _as_dict(_as_dict(report.get("ai_prompt_pack")).get("evidence_snapshot")).get("functional_benefic_malefic")
+    fbm = _as_dict(fbm) or _as_dict(modules.get("functional_benefic_malefic"))
+
+    career_conv = _convergence_for(modules, "career", "status", "profession", "work")
+    marriage_conv = _convergence_for(modules, "marriage", "partnership", "relationship")
+    wealth_conv = _convergence_for(modules, "wealth", "finance", "income", "gain")
+    relationship = _as_dict(modules.get("relationship_strict_evidence"))
+    rel_judgement = _as_dict(relationship.get("event_judgement"))
+    rel_present = _as_dict(relationship.get("present_evidence"))
+    d9 = _as_dict(rel_present.get("d9_navamsa"))
+    ul = _as_dict(rel_present.get("upapada_lagna"))
+    dk = _as_dict(rel_present.get("darakaraka"))
+    ketu_house = _as_dict(planets.get("Ketu")).get("house")
+
+    topics = [
+        _topic(
+            topic_id="relationship_partnership",
+            title="婚恋与长期合作为什么是当前强主题",
+            reality_value="帮助用户判断关系、合作、相亲、公开关系或长期承诺是否值得深入推进。",
+            why="婚恋/合作不是靠用户主动问才触发；当前证据里第7宫、D9、UL、DK 与多系统时间层已经可读。",
+            evidence=[
+                _evidence_line("Vimshottari", md_label),
+                _evidence_line("Dasa 收敛", marriage_conv.get("convergence_level") or "not_found"),
+                _evidence_line("D9", f"Asc={_as_dict(d9.get('Ascendant')).get('sign', '-')}; 7th={_as_dict(d9.get('_d9_analysis')).get('navamsa_7th_sign', '-')}"),
+                _evidence_line("UL", f"{ul.get('sign', '-')} H{ul.get('house', '-')}"),
+                _evidence_line("DK", f"{dk.get('dk_planet', '-')} H{dk.get('dk_house', '-')}"),
+                _evidence_line("Strict verdict", rel_judgement.get("verdict") or "not_available"),
+            ],
+            confidence="medium" if marriage_conv or relationship else "low",
+            vedastro=_vedastro_snapshot(modules, "marriage"),
+            questions=[
+                "我现在适合认真发展关系，还是更适合筛选和观察？",
+                "我的伴侣画像、认识场景和相处风险是什么？",
+                "未来哪些时间窗口适合推进关系公开或承诺？",
+            ],
+            priority=90 if marriage_conv else 65,
+        ),
+        _topic(
+            topic_id="career_direction",
+            title="事业定位是否正在重构",
+            reality_value="帮助用户判断是继续深耕、换方向、做产品化，还是先修系统和长期资产。",
+            why="事业主题需要把10宫、A10/D10、多系统 Dasha 与 VedAstro 事业雷达放在一起看。",
+            evidence=[
+                _evidence_line("Vimshottari", md_label),
+                _evidence_line("10宫触发", f"Ketu house={ketu_house}" if ketu_house else "check D10/A10"),
+                _evidence_line("Dasa 收敛", career_conv.get("convergence_level") or "not_found"),
+                _evidence_line("Functional layer", f"benefics={fbm.get('functional_benefics', [])}; malefics={fbm.get('functional_malefics', [])}"),
+            ],
+            confidence="medium" if career_conv or ketu_house == 10 else "low",
+            vedastro=_vedastro_snapshot(modules, "career"),
+            questions=[
+                "我现在适合换方向还是继续深耕？",
+                "2026 年事业吉利在哪里，不利在哪里？",
+                "哪些月份适合推进项目、发布产品或谈合作？",
+            ],
+            priority=82 if career_conv or ketu_house == 10 else 60,
+        ),
+        _topic(
+            topic_id="birth_time_rectification",
+            title="出生时间是否需要微调",
+            reality_value="帮助用户把婚恋、事业、财富应期从泛泛判断推进到可回验时间窗口。",
+            why="D9、D10、UL、A10 对出生时间敏感；如果用户想问具体月份/日期，先校正时间更有价值。",
+            evidence=[
+                _evidence_line("birth time", _as_dict(report.get("birth_info")).get("time", "-")),
+                _evidence_line("sensitive layers", "D9 / D10 / UL / A10"),
+                _evidence_line("current timing", f"{md_label}; {md_start or '-'} to {md_end or '-'}"),
+            ],
+            confidence="medium",
+            vedastro=_vedastro_snapshot(modules, "marriage"),
+            questions=[
+                "我可以用过去事件校正出生时间吗？",
+                "哪些人生事件最适合用来校正出生时间？",
+                "我只知道一个时间区间，系统应该先问我哪些 yes/no 问题？",
+            ],
+            answer_mode="yes_no_or_free_text",
+            priority=80,
+        ),
+        _topic(
+            topic_id="wealth_risk",
+            title="财富、借贷和交易风险怎样用数据拆开",
+            reality_value="帮助用户把收入、现金流、借贷、买卖和投资风险分开判断，而不是只说财运好坏。",
+            why="财富主题必须同时看2宫、11宫、D2/D11、Dasha 与 VedAstro wealth 标签。",
+            evidence=[
+                _evidence_line("Vimshottari", md_label),
+                _evidence_line("Dasa 收敛", wealth_conv.get("convergence_level") or "not_found"),
+                _evidence_line("required vargas", "D2 / D11"),
+            ],
+            confidence="medium" if wealth_conv else "low",
+            vedastro=_vedastro_snapshot(modules, "wealth"),
+            questions=[
+                "2026 年哪些钱可以赚，哪些钱要避险？",
+                "我适合靠项目、投资、合作还是长期积累赚钱？",
+                "哪些时间窗口不适合借贷、买卖或大额投入？",
+            ],
+            priority=70 if wealth_conv else 50,
+        ),
+    ]
+
+    topics.sort(key=lambda item: (-int(item.get("priority", 0)), item["id"]))
+    return topics[:4]
diff --git a/scripts/jyotish_api_server.py b/scripts/jyotish_api_server.py
index 787ec60b..c0ee35a1 100644
--- a/scripts/jyotish_api_server.py
+++ b/scripts/jyotish_api_server.py
@@ -81,6 +81,26 @@ def _attach_vedastro_main_entry_overview(chart_result, birth_payload):
     return chart_result
 
 
+def _attach_guided_topics(chart_result):
+    if not isinstance(chart_result, dict):
+        return chart_result
+    modules = chart_result.setdefault('modules', {})
+    if not isinstance(modules, dict):
+        modules = {}
+        chart_result['modules'] = modules
+    if isinstance(modules.get('guided_topics'), list):
+        return chart_result
+    try:
+        builder = _load_local_module('guided_topic_discovery').build_guided_topics
+        modules['guided_topics'] = builder(chart_result)
+    except Exception as exc:
+        modules['guided_topics'] = []
+        warnings = chart_result.setdefault('warnings', [])
+        if isinstance(warnings, list):
+            warnings.append(f'guided-topics: {exc}')
+    return chart_result
+
+
 def _build_vedastro_overview_payload_from_chart(chart):
     modules = chart.get('modules') if isinstance(chart, dict) else {}
     overview = modules.get('vedastro_range_scan_result') if isinstance(modules, dict) else {}
@@ -2184,6 +2204,7 @@ class JyotishAPIHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
                 'today': body.get('today') or body.get('current_date'),
                 'transit_date': body.get('transit_date'),
             })
+            _attach_guided_topics(result)
             result['ai_prompt_pack'] = self._build_chart_prompt_pack(result)
             return result
         except ImportError:
@@ -2267,6 +2288,7 @@ class JyotishAPIHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
             'ayanamsa': 'lahiri',
             'node_mode': 'mean',
         })
+        _attach_guided_topics(result)
         result['ai_prompt_pack'] = self._build_chart_prompt_pack(result)
         return result
 
@@ -2278,6 +2300,19 @@ class JyotishAPIHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
         shadbala = chart.get('shadbala') or {}
         functional_layer = self._functional_benefic_malefic_snapshot(planets, ascendant)
         vedastro_overview = _build_vedastro_overview_payload_from_chart(chart)
+        _attach_guided_topics(chart)
+        modules = chart.get('modules') if isinstance(chart.get('modules'), dict) else {}
+        guided_topics = modules.get('guided_topics') if isinstance(modules.get('guided_topics'), list) else []
+        try:
+            capability_evidence_pool = _load_local_module('capability_evidence_pool').build_capability_evidence_pool_summary()
+        except Exception:
+            capability_evidence_pool = {
+                'scope': 'backend_capability_evidence_pool',
+                'total_entries': 0,
+                'conclusion_policy': {
+                    'all_89_entries_must_not_be_flattened_into_conclusions': True,
+                },
+            }
         top_strength = sorted(
             [
                 {
@@ -2348,6 +2383,8 @@ class JyotishAPIHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
                 },
                 'functional_benefic_malefic': functional_layer,
                 'vedastro_overview': vedastro_overview,
+                'guided_topics': guided_topics,
+                'capability_evidence_pool': capability_evidence_pool,
                 'quality_boundary': {
                     'external_oracle_status': 'D1/D9/VedAstro longitude boundary covered; Dasha/Shadbala external absolute calibration still requires multi-source oracle expansion.',
                 },
diff --git a/scripts/jyotish_engine.py b/scripts/jyotish_engine.py
index f6dd2f4b..e4896441 100644
--- a/scripts/jyotish_engine.py
+++ b/scripts/jyotish_engine.py
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ from datetime import datetime, timedelta
 from typing import Dict, List
 from tabulate import tabulate
 from life_stage_hook import generate_life_stage_hooks
+from capability_evidence_pool import build_capability_evidence_pool_summary
+from guided_topic_discovery import build_guided_topics
 
 from ayanamsa_utils import (
     AYANAMSA_DISPLAY_NAMES,
@@ -1165,6 +1167,8 @@ def _build_ai_prompt_pack(report):
     relationship_narrative = _build_relationship_narrative_payload(modules.get('relationship_strict_evidence'))
     vimsopaka_semantic_summary = _build_vimsopaka_semantic_summary(modules.get('vimsopaka'))
     vedastro_overview = _build_vedastro_overview_payload(modules)
+    guided_topics = modules.get('guided_topics') if isinstance(modules.get('guided_topics'), list) else build_guided_topics(report)
+    capability_evidence_pool = build_capability_evidence_pool_summary()
 
     shadbala_ranking = []
     for planet_name, pdata in sorted(
@@ -1236,6 +1240,8 @@ def _build_ai_prompt_pack(report):
         'oracle_progress': oracle_progress,
         'functional_benefic_malefic': functional_layer,
         'vedastro_overview': vedastro_overview,
+        'guided_topics': guided_topics,
+        'capability_evidence_pool': capability_evidence_pool,
         'technique_audit_table': technique_audit_table,
         'relationship_narrative': relationship_narrative,
         'vimsopaka_semantic_summary': vimsopaka_semantic_summary,
@@ -1250,6 +1256,7 @@ def _build_ai_prompt_pack(report):
         "输出结构建议：参数声明、核心星盘、关系/事业/财富/健康分主题、当前时机、证据表、风险边界、可行动建议。",
         "若引用经典法则，请优先检索 retrieval_plan.local_reference_docs；需要外部断语时再做 web/source verification。",
         "若 evidence_snapshot.vedastro_overview.status 为 ok，请把它作为用户可见外部概览证据明确写出，但不要把 overview-only 结果误当作长周期精扫结论。",
+        "若 evidence_snapshot.capability_evidence_pool 存在，请把 89 项视为后台备选证据池；不要把所有能力条目平铺成结论，也不要让 audit_only/alias 条目影响占星判断。",
     ]
 
     return {
@@ -5130,6 +5137,12 @@ def cmd_full_reading(args):
     except Exception as e:
         report['warnings'].append(f"vedastro-main-entry-overview: {e}")
 
+    try:
+        report['modules']['guided_topics'] = build_guided_topics(report)
+    except Exception as e:
+        report['warnings'].append(f"guided-topics: {e}")
+        report['modules']['guided_topics'] = []
+
     report['ai_prompt_pack'] = _build_ai_prompt_pack(report)
 
     return report
diff --git a/tests/test_capability_evidence_pool.py b/tests/test_capability_evidence_pool.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..88629094
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/test_capability_evidence_pool.py
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import json
+from pathlib import Path
+
+from scripts.capability_evidence_pool import build_capability_evidence_pool_summary
+
+
+ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
+REGISTRY = ROOT / "references" / "technique_registry.json"
+README = ROOT / "README.md"
+
+
+def test_registry_is_backend_evidence_pool_not_flat_user_skill_list() -> None:
+    registry = json.loads(REGISTRY.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
+    techniques = registry["techniques"]
+
+    assert registry["registry_role"] == "backend_capability_evidence_pool"
+    assert registry["public_label"] == "89 capability entries"
+    assert "question-domain router" in registry["ordinary_user_policy"]
+
+    allowed_entry_types = {
+        "core_technique",
+        "supporting_indicator",
+        "composite_adjudicator",
+        "workflow_or_engineering",
+        "alias_entry",
+    }
+    allowed_roles = {"primary", "secondary", "context", "audit_only", "alias"}
+    allowed_visibility = {"ordinary_topic_router", "expert_audit", "hidden"}
+    allowed_prediction = {
+        "case_validated_partial",
+        "support_only",
+        "not_claimed",
+        "not_applicable",
+    }
+
+    for tech_id, tech in techniques.items():
+        assert tech["entry_type"] in allowed_entry_types, tech_id
+        assert tech["evidence_role"] in allowed_roles, tech_id
+        assert tech["user_visibility"] in allowed_visibility, tech_id
+        assert tech["verification_level"]["calculation"] in {"verified", "partial", "not_applicable"}, tech_id
+        assert tech["verification_level"]["rule"] in {"verified", "partial", "not_applicable"}, tech_id
+        assert tech["verification_level"]["prediction"] in allowed_prediction, tech_id
+        assert tech["conclusion_policy"], tech_id
+
+    assert techniques["case_validator"]["evidence_role"] == "audit_only"
+    assert techniques["thematic_report_orchestrator"]["entry_type"] == "workflow_or_engineering"
+    assert techniques["neechabhanga"]["evidence_role"] == "alias"
+    assert techniques["special_lagnas"]["evidence_role"] == "alias"
+
+
+def test_evidence_pool_summary_routes_few_primary_items_and_many_support_items() -> None:
+    summary = build_capability_evidence_pool_summary()
+
+    assert summary["scope"] == "backend_capability_evidence_pool"
+    assert summary["total_entries"] == 89
+    assert summary["ordinary_user_policy"].startswith("Users see topic-level")
+    assert summary["evidence_role_counts"]["primary"] >= 8
+    assert summary["evidence_role_counts"]["secondary"] > summary["evidence_role_counts"]["primary"]
+    assert summary["evidence_role_counts"]["audit_only"] >= 3
+    assert summary["prediction_verification_counts"]["not_claimed"] > 0
+    assert summary["conclusion_policy"]["primary_chain_required"] is True
+    assert summary["conclusion_policy"]["all_89_entries_must_not_be_flattened_into_conclusions"] is True
+
+
+def test_readme_uses_capability_entries_language_instead_of_89_techniques_claim() -> None:
+    readme = README.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+
+    assert "89 capability entries" in readme
+    assert "89 techniques" not in readme
+    assert "backend evidence pool" in readme
diff --git a/tests/test_cli_smoke.py b/tests/test_cli_smoke.py
index 678fd5b4..8cedd9df 100644
--- a/tests/test_cli_smoke.py
+++ b/tests/test_cli_smoke.py
@@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ def test_full_reading_reports_ayanamsa_metadata_and_ai_prompt_pack() -> None:
     assert vedastro_rows[0]["status"] in {"used", "blocked"}
     assert "overview only" in vedastro_rows[0]["note"]
     assert "domain_statuses" in vedastro_rows[0]["note"]
+    capability_pool = prompt_pack["evidence_snapshot"]["capability_evidence_pool"]
+    assert capability_pool["scope"] == "backend_capability_evidence_pool"
+    assert capability_pool["total_entries"] == 89
+    assert capability_pool["conclusion_policy"]["all_89_entries_must_not_be_flattened_into_conclusions"] is True
+    assert "后台备选证据池" in prompt_pack["prompt_zh"]
 
 
 def test_full_reading_generates_guided_topics_from_real_evidence() -> None:
diff --git a/tests/test_readme_badges.py b/tests/test_readme_badges.py
index 0645c14e..296ba2bf 100644
--- a/tests/test_readme_badges.py
+++ b/tests/test_readme_badges.py
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ def test_readme_badges_match_technique_registry_counts() -> None:
     counts = Counter(item["status"] for item in techniques)
     total = len(registry["techniques"])
 
-    assert _readme_badge_value("Techniques") == total
+    assert _readme_badge_value("Capabilities") == total
     assert _readme_badge_value("Covered") == counts["covered"]
     assert _readme_badge_value("Complete") == counts["complete"]
     assert _readme_badge_value("Partial") == counts["partial"]