fix(rectification): refresh remaining probes and targeted collect before delivering range (BUG-653/654)

Dated-choice exhaustion is not convergence. Refresh probes from remaining
active candidates, then ask a targeted collect, then deliver. Skill 10.0.24.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

frontend/tests/rectification-eight-method.test.ts

@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ test("read-case follows method plan and keeps D9/D10 type tables when SQL missin
     execute(input: unknown): Promise<{
       conversation_summary: { missing_evidence_categories: string[] };
       method_followup_plan: {
-        next_followup: { method_id: string; domain: string | null; intent?: string } | null;
+        next_followup: { method_id: string; domain: string | null; intent?: string; kind_hint?: string } | null;
         deferred_followup: { method_id: string; domain: string | null } | null;
         session_outcome: string;
       };
@@ -968,10 +968,16 @@ test("read-case follows method plan and keeps D9/D10 type tables when SQL missin
     }>;
   }).execute({ caseId: CASE_ID, projection: "full_diagnostics" });
   assert.deepEqual(projection.conversation_summary.missing_evidence_categories, ["relocation", "health", "finance"]);
-  // 原值: d9_relationship / relationship
-  // 新值: 三件三类已开训练门，不再按方法轮转采集
-  // 原因: SQL 缺类不得压过收集池/S2（BUG-648）
-  assert.notEqual(projection.method_followup_plan.next_followup?.intent, "collect_method_evidence");
+  // 原值: 训练门开后不再按方法轮转采集
+  // 新值: D9 仍换升且感情未覆盖，先定向补事
+  // 原因: 带年月池空后按剩余层定向补事（BUG-654）；SQL 缺类仍不得压过此问
+  assert.equal(projection.method_followup_plan.next_followup?.intent, "collect_method_evidence");
+  assert.equal(projection.method_followup_plan.next_followup?.domain, "relationship");
+  assert.match(projection.method_followup_plan.next_followup?.kind_hint ?? "", /targeted/);
+  assert.doesNotMatch(
+    projection.method_followup_plan.next_followup?.domain ?? "",
+    /relocation|health|finance/,
+  );
   assert.equal(projection.method_followup_plan.deferred_followup, null);
   assert.equal(projection.internal_observations.find((item) => item.layer === "d9")?.ask_theme, "relationship_style");
   assert.equal(projection.latest_result.confirmation_allowed, false);
@@ -1410,9 +1416,9 @@ test("rescore failure does not fail the evidence write", async () => {
   assert.ok(result.rescore.error_code);
 });
 
-test("public tool surface stays at 14 and new cases bind 10.0.23", () => {
+test("public tool surface stays at 14 and new cases bind 10.0.24", () => {
   assert.equal(PUBLIC_RECTIFICATION_TOOLS.length, 14);
-  assert.equal(RECTIFICATION_SKILL_VERSION, "10.0.23");
+  assert.equal(RECTIFICATION_SKILL_VERSION, "10.0.24");
   const deprecated = resolveExactSkillPackage(
     "jyotish-birth-time-rectification",
     "10.0.2",
@@ -3224,6 +3230,14 @@ test("offer-candidates allows a 34/33/33 tie after method coverage when remainin
         evidenceLedgerFingerprint: scoreableFingerprintForRawEvidence(methodCoverageTieEvidence),
         decisionReceipt: {
           propose_allowed: true,
+          inference_state: {
+            ...producedInferenceState([
+              { id: CANDIDATE_ID, time: "05:00", relative_support: 34 },
+              { id: SECOND_CANDIDATE_ID, time: "05:01", relative_support: 33 },
+              { id: THIRD_CANDIDATE_ID, time: "05:02", relative_support: 33 },
+            ]),
+            refresh_count: 1,
+          },
           window_scan: {
             scanned: true,
             d9_lagna_count: 3,