Land relationship narrative and dynamic hook workflow

tests/test_cli_smoke.py

@@ -299,6 +299,20 @@ def test_full_reading_reports_ayanamsa_metadata_and_ai_prompt_pack() -> None:
     assert strength_rows
     assert strength_rows[0]["status"] == "used"
     assert "Shadbala" in strength_rows[0]["note"]
+    relationship_synastry_rows = [row for row in audit_table if row["technique"] == "Relationship Synastry Taxonomy"]
+    assert relationship_synastry_rows
+    assert relationship_synastry_rows[0]["status"] in {"used", "blocked"}
+    assert "relationship secondary_context" in relationship_synastry_rows[0]["note"]
+    assert "compatibility support" in relationship_synastry_rows[0]["note"]
+    assert "protective kuta support" in relationship_synastry_rows[0]["note"]
+    relationship_narrative = prompt_pack["evidence_snapshot"]["relationship_narrative"]
+    assert relationship_narrative["headline"]
+    assert isinstance(relationship_narrative["strengths"], list)
+    assert isinstance(relationship_narrative["risks"], list)
+    assert isinstance(relationship_narrative["boundaries"], list)
+    assert relationship_narrative["markdown"]
+    assert "D9" in "".join(relationship_narrative["boundaries"])
+    assert "dual dasha" in relationship_narrative["markdown"]
     oracle_progress = prompt_pack["evidence_snapshot"]["oracle_progress"]
     assert oracle_progress["scope"] == "external_oracle_evidence_validation"
     assert oracle_progress["valid_packets"] >= 4

tests/test_mcp_strict_workflow_relationship.py

@@ -3,8 +3,16 @@
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
+import sys
+from pathlib import Path
+
 from mcp_server import _collect_strict_evidence
 
+ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
+sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / "scripts"))
+
+import jyotish_engine  # noqa: E402
+
 
 def _base_relationship_result() -> dict:
     return {
@@ -50,6 +58,7 @@ def test_relationship_jaimini_bridge_lifts_legal_marriage_label() -> None:
         "jaimini_support",
         "ul_support",
         "virodhargala_obstruction",
+        "vedastro_range_scan_missing",
     ]
 
 
@@ -70,9 +79,62 @@ def test_relationship_jaimini_bridge_stays_context_only_when_d9_missing() -> Non
         "jaimini_support",
         "ul_support",
         "virodhargala_obstruction",
+        "vedastro_range_scan_missing",
     ]
 
 
+def test_relationship_jaimini_bridge_cannot_lift_legal_marriage_when_narayana_is_missing() -> None:
+    result = _base_relationship_result()
+    del result["modules"]["narayana_dasha"]
+
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", result)
+
+    assert strict["present_evidence"]["jaimini_marriage_support"] == {
+        "level": "moderate",
+        "signals": ["darakaraka_active", "dk_7h_link"],
+        "source": "jaimini_bridge_v1",
+    }
+    assert strict["event_judgement"]["dominant_label"] is None
+    assert "jaimini_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "public_formalization_candidate" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+
+
+def test_relationship_jaimini_bridge_uses_public_formalization_as_context_only_when_marriage_gate_is_open_but_label_support_missing() -> None:
+    result = _base_relationship_result()
+    del result["modules"]["vivah_saham"]
+    del result["modules"]["dasa_convergence"]
+    result["modules"]["external_activation"] = {
+        "evidence_ledger": [
+            {
+                "source": "vedastro_service_adapter_candidate",
+                "operation": "range_scan",
+                "domain": "marriage",
+                "event_id": "public_relationship_window",
+                "signal_key": "public_relationship_window",
+                "score": 78,
+            }
+        ]
+    }
+    result["modules"]["synastry"] = {
+        "total_score": 28.0,
+        "max_score": 36.0,
+        "is_approved": True,
+        "additional_kutas": {
+            "Mahendra": "good",
+            "Vedha": "good",
+            "Rajju": {"result": "good", "group": None, "effect": ""},
+        },
+    }
+
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", result)
+
+    assert strict["event_judgement"]["dominant_label"] is None
+    assert "jaimini_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "external_activation_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "public_formalization_candidate" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+
+
 def test_relationship_argala_bridge_uses_seventh_house_as_modifier_only() -> None:
     result = _base_relationship_result()
 
@@ -135,7 +197,16 @@ def test_relationship_synastry_bridge_adds_context_and_small_score_bump_without_
     assert strict["present_evidence"]["synastry_relationship_support"] == {
         "level": "supportive",
         "source": "synastry_relationship_bridge_v1",
-        "signals": ["ashtakoot_approved", "ashtakoot_high_score", "kuta_exception_clean"],
+        "signals": [
+            "ashtakoot_approved",
+            "ashtakoot_high_score",
+            "mahendra_support",
+            "stree_deergha_support",
+            "vedha_clean",
+            "rajju_clean",
+            "bad_constellations_clean",
+            "kuta_exception_clean",
+        ],
         "total_score": 29.0,
         "approved": True,
     }
@@ -188,11 +259,252 @@ def test_relationship_synastry_bridge_understands_nested_bad_constellations_and_
     assert strict["present_evidence"]["synastry_relationship_support"] == {
         "level": "moderate",
         "source": "synastry_relationship_bridge_v1",
-        "signals": ["ashtakoot_approved", "exception_mitigated_match", "kuta_exception_clean"],
+        "signals": [
+            "ashtakoot_approved",
+            "exception_mitigated_match",
+            "mahendra_support",
+            "stree_deergha_support",
+            "vedha_clean",
+            "rajju_clean",
+            "bad_constellations_clean",
+            "kuta_exception_clean",
+        ],
         "total_score": 18.0,
         "approved": True,
     }
     assert "synastry_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_compatibility_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_protective_kuta_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_exception_mitigated" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_kuta_exception_clean" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "mahendra_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "stree_deergha_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "vedha_clean" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "rajju_clean" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "bad_constellations_clean" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+
+
+def test_relationship_synastry_exception_alone_cannot_create_false_lift_or_clean_kuta_context() -> None:
+    result = _base_relationship_result()
+    del result["modules"]["varga_full"]["D9_Navamsa"]
+    del result["modules"]["special_lagnas"]["Upapada_Lagna"]
+    del result["modules"]["vivah_saham"]
+    del result["modules"]["narayana_dasha"]
+    result["modules"]["synastry"] = {
+        "total_score": 14.0,
+        "max_score": 36.0,
+        "is_approved": False,
+        "exceptions": ["Nadi exception discussed but not fully mitigated."],
+        "additional_kutas": {
+            "Mahendra": "good",
+            "StreeDeergha": "good",
+            "Vedha": "bad",
+            "Rajju": {"result": "bad", "group": "same", "effect": "dosha"},
+            "BadConstellations": {"result": "bad", "issues": ["vedha clash"]},
+        },
+    }
+
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", result)
+
+    assert strict["present_evidence"]["synastry_relationship_support"] == {
+        "level": "none",
+        "source": "synastry_relationship_bridge_v1",
+        "signals": [
+            "exception_mitigated_match",
+            "mahendra_support",
+            "stree_deergha_support",
+        ],
+        "total_score": 14.0,
+        "approved": False,
+    }
+    assert strict["event_judgement"]["dominant_label"] is None
+    assert "synastry_support" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_compatibility_support" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_protective_kuta_support" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_exception_mitigated" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_kuta_exception_clean" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "mahendra_support" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "rajju_clean" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+
+
+def test_relationship_good_kutas_cannot_override_weak_core_marriage_promise() -> None:
+    result = _base_relationship_result()
+    del result["modules"]["vivah_saham"]
+    del result["modules"]["dasa_convergence"]
+    result["modules"]["jaimini"] = {
+        "darakaraka": {"planet": "Venus", "house": 3},
+    }
+    result["modules"]["synastry"] = {
+        "total_score": 31.0,
+        "max_score": 36.0,
+        "is_approved": True,
+        "additional_kutas": {
+            "Mahendra": "good",
+            "StreeDeergha": "good",
+            "Vedha": "good",
+            "Rajju": {"result": "good", "group": None, "effect": ""},
+            "BadConstellations": {"result": "good", "issues": []},
+        },
+    }
+
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", result)
+
+    assert strict["present_evidence"]["jaimini_marriage_support"] == {
+        "level": "weak",
+        "signals": ["darakaraka_active"],
+        "source": "jaimini_bridge_v1",
+    }
+    assert strict["present_evidence"]["synastry_relationship_support"]["level"] == "supportive"
+    assert strict["event_judgement"]["dominant_label"] is None
+    assert "synastry_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_compatibility_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "synastry_protective_kuta_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert "jaimini_support" not in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+
+
+def test_relationship_protective_kutas_do_not_block_confidence_downgrade_when_timing_layers_conflict() -> None:
+    result = _base_relationship_result()
+    result["modules"]["synastry"] = {
+        "total_score": 31.0,
+        "max_score": 36.0,
+        "is_approved": True,
+        "additional_kutas": {
+            "Mahendra": "good",
+            "StreeDeergha": "good",
+            "Vedha": "good",
+            "Rajju": {"result": "good", "group": None, "effect": ""},
+            "BadConstellations": {"result": "good", "issues": []},
+        },
+    }
+    result["modules"]["external_activation"] = {
+        "evidence_ledger": [
+            {
+                "source": "vedastro_service_adapter_candidate",
+                "operation": "range_scan",
+                "domain": "career",
+                "event_id": "career_window_only",
+                "signal_key": "career_only_external_window",
+                "score": 74,
+            }
+        ]
+    }
+    result["modules"]["dasa_convergence"] = {
+        "domain_activations": {
+            "career_status": {"convergence_level": "L4", "probability": "70-85%"}
+        }
+    }
+
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", result)
+
+    assert "synastry_protective_kuta_support" in strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"]
+    assert strict["event_judgement"]["dominant_label"] == "legal_marriage"
+    assert strict["confidence_cap"] == "low"
+
+
+def test_relationship_narrative_payload_turns_synastry_taxonomy_into_user_readable_boundary() -> None:
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", _base_relationship_result())
+    strict["present_evidence"]["synastry_relationship_support"] = {
+        "level": "supportive",
+        "source": "synastry_relationship_bridge_v1",
+        "signals": [
+            "ashtakoot_approved",
+            "mahendra_support",
+            "stree_deergha_support",
+            "vedha_clean",
+            "rajju_clean",
+        ],
+        "total_score": 29.0,
+        "approved": True,
+    }
+    strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"] = strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"] + [
+        "synastry_support",
+        "synastry_compatibility_support",
+        "synastry_protective_kuta_support",
+    ]
+    strict["confidence_cap"] = "low"
+
+    payload = jyotish_engine._build_relationship_narrative_payload(strict)
+
+    assert "婚恋" in payload["headline"]
+    assert any("合盘" in item for item in payload["strengths"])
+    assert any("protective kuta" in item.lower() for item in payload["strengths"])
+    assert any("dual dasha" in item.lower() for item in payload["risks"])
+    assert any("legal_marriage" in item for item in payload["boundaries"])
+    assert "D9" in payload["markdown"]
+    assert "dual dasha" in payload["markdown"]
+
+
+def test_relationship_narrative_payload_exposes_public_formalization_candidate_as_context_only() -> None:
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", _base_relationship_result())
+    strict["event_judgement"]["dominant_label"] = None
+    strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"] = [
+        "darakaraka_active",
+        "jaimini_support",
+        "ul_support",
+        "external_activation_support",
+        "public_formalization_candidate",
+    ]
+    strict["present_evidence"].pop("vivah_saham", None)
+    strict["present_evidence"].pop("marriage_convergence", None)
+    strict["confidence_cap"] = "low"
+
+    payload = jyotish_engine._build_relationship_narrative_payload(strict)
+
+    assert any("public_formalization" in item for item in payload["strengths"])
+    assert any("不等于法律婚姻" in item for item in payload["boundaries"])
+    assert "public_formalization_candidate" in payload["markdown"]
+    assert "legal_marriage" in payload["markdown"]
+
+
+def test_relationship_narrative_payload_for_public_formalization_candidate_with_timing_conflict_explicitly_warns_not_to_misread_as_near_marriage() -> None:
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", _base_relationship_result())
+    strict["event_judgement"]["dominant_label"] = None
+    strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"] = [
+        "darakaraka_active",
+        "jaimini_support",
+        "ul_support",
+        "external_activation_support",
+        "public_formalization_candidate",
+    ]
+    strict["present_evidence"].pop("vivah_saham", None)
+    strict["present_evidence"].pop("marriage_convergence", None)
+    strict["confidence_cap"] = "low"
+
+    payload = jyotish_engine._build_relationship_narrative_payload(strict)
+
+    assert any("public_formalization_candidate" in item for item in payload["strengths"])
+    assert any("不能误读成接近结婚" in item for item in payload["risks"])
+    assert any("不等于法律婚姻" in item for item in payload["boundaries"])
+    assert "不能误读成接近结婚" in payload["markdown"]
+
+
+def test_relationship_narrative_payload_does_not_translate_public_formalization_candidate_plus_synastry_support_plus_weak_core_promise_into_marriage_approach() -> None:
+    strict = _collect_strict_evidence("relationship", _base_relationship_result())
+    strict["event_judgement"]["dominant_label"] = None
+    strict["event_judgement"]["secondary_context"] = [
+        "darakaraka_active",
+        "ul_support",
+        "synastry_support",
+        "synastry_compatibility_support",
+        "public_formalization_candidate",
+    ]
+    strict["present_evidence"]["jaimini_marriage_support"] = {
+        "level": "weak",
+        "signals": ["darakaraka_active"],
+        "source": "jaimini_bridge_v1",
+    }
+    strict["present_evidence"].pop("vivah_saham", None)
+    strict["present_evidence"].pop("marriage_convergence", None)
+    strict["confidence_cap"] = "low"
+
+    payload = jyotish_engine._build_relationship_narrative_payload(strict)
+
+    assert any("合盘支持已进入婚恋主链" in item for item in payload["strengths"])
+    assert any("公开化/关系可见度候选" in item for item in payload["strengths"])
+    assert any("不能误读成接近结婚" in item for item in payload["risks"])
+    assert any("不得越权抬升 legal_marriage" in item for item in payload["boundaries"])
+    assert "public_formalization_candidate" in payload["markdown"]
+    assert "legal_marriage" in payload["markdown"]
 
 
 def test_relationship_dignity_guardrail_ignores_non_relevant_planets() -> None: