fix: enforce existing mevg invocation across timing workflows
This commit is contained in:
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
|
||||
- `Transit / Double Transit`
|
||||
- `Shadbala`
|
||||
- `Functional Benefic/Malefic`
|
||||
- `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
- `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
高严谨时尽量补:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -130,6 +132,18 @@
|
||||
3. `main conflicts`
|
||||
4. `Technique Audit Table`
|
||||
5. `raw evidence`
|
||||
6. `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
7. `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
`MEVG / Global Web Evidence` 必须复用
|
||||
`references/mandatory-verification-gate-protocol.md`,至少说明 source tier、
|
||||
global web evidence collection、conflict arbitration 和未验证声明如何降级。
|
||||
|
||||
`Real Case Calibration` 必须给出真实案例参考、公开 benchmark case,或明确的
|
||||
case gap。没有可比案例时不得假装完成,应降低置信度。
|
||||
|
||||
pure calculation exemption 只适用于纯计算、纯代码、纯项目维护或不解释运势意义的原始
|
||||
数据输出;一旦解释事业运势、职业窗口、项目落地或职位变化,必须执行 MEVG 与真实案例校正。
|
||||
|
||||
示例 verdict:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -155,3 +169,5 @@
|
||||
- 没交代 `AmK / Karakamsha`
|
||||
- 未说明 birth time precision
|
||||
- 未说明 `Ayanamsa / Node mode`
|
||||
- 未完成 `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
- 未完成 `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
|
||||
- `Transit / Double Transit`
|
||||
- `Vivah Saham`
|
||||
- `Functional Benefic/Malefic`
|
||||
- `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
- `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
若用户要求高严谨,还应尽量加:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -133,6 +135,18 @@
|
||||
3. `main conflicts`
|
||||
4. `Technique Audit Table`
|
||||
5. `raw evidence`
|
||||
6. `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
7. `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
`MEVG / Global Web Evidence` 必须复用
|
||||
`references/mandatory-verification-gate-protocol.md`,至少说明 source tier、
|
||||
global web evidence collection、conflict arbitration 和未验证声明如何降级。
|
||||
|
||||
`Real Case Calibration` 必须给出真实案例参考、公开 benchmark case,或明确的
|
||||
case gap。没有可比案例时不得假装完成,应降低置信度。
|
||||
|
||||
pure calculation exemption 只适用于纯计算、纯代码、纯项目维护或不解释运势意义的原始
|
||||
数据输出;一旦解释婚恋运势、关系窗口或婚期,必须执行 MEVG 与真实案例校正。
|
||||
|
||||
示例 verdict:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -154,3 +168,5 @@
|
||||
- 只看单一文章规则
|
||||
- 未说明 birth time precision
|
||||
- 未说明 `Ayanamsa / Node mode`
|
||||
- 未完成 `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
- 未完成 `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -66,6 +66,17 @@
|
||||
- `node_mode`
|
||||
- `maturity`
|
||||
|
||||
所有涉及印度占星推运、运势解读、事件预测、流年流月、健康、搬迁、考试、
|
||||
出行、出生时间校正辅助或技法可靠性判断的问题,都必须复用既有
|
||||
`references/mandatory-verification-gate-protocol.md`:
|
||||
|
||||
- `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`:记录全球 / 全网外部资料采集、source tier、
|
||||
conflict arbitration 和未验证声明的降级。
|
||||
- `Real Case Calibration`:记录真实案例参考、公开 benchmark case,或明确
|
||||
case gap。
|
||||
- pure calculation exemption 只适用于纯计算、纯代码、纯项目维护或不解释运势意义的
|
||||
原始数据输出;一旦解释推运或运势意义,必须执行 MEVG 与真实案例校正。
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Adjudication
|
||||
@@ -124,6 +135,8 @@
|
||||
3. `conflicts`
|
||||
4. `Technique Audit Table`
|
||||
5. `raw evidence`
|
||||
6. `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
7. `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
最小 JSON 形态:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -151,3 +164,5 @@
|
||||
- 题目域分盘未展开(relationship -> D9/UL;career -> D10/A10;wealth -> D2/D11)
|
||||
- 外部 oracle 未闭环却假装全局封顶
|
||||
- 缺少 `Technique Audit Table`
|
||||
- 缺少 `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
- 缺少 `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
|
||||
- `Shadbala`
|
||||
- `Ashtakavarga`
|
||||
- `Functional Benefic/Malefic`
|
||||
- `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
- `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
高严谨时尽量补:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -172,6 +174,18 @@
|
||||
3. `main conflicts`
|
||||
4. `Technique Audit Table`
|
||||
5. `raw evidence`
|
||||
6. `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
7. `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
`MEVG / Global Web Evidence` 必须复用
|
||||
`references/mandatory-verification-gate-protocol.md`,至少说明 source tier、
|
||||
global web evidence collection、conflict arbitration 和未验证声明如何降级。
|
||||
|
||||
`Real Case Calibration` 必须给出真实案例参考、公开 benchmark case,或明确的
|
||||
case gap。没有可比案例时不得假装完成,应降低置信度。
|
||||
|
||||
pure calculation exemption 只适用于纯计算、纯代码、纯项目维护或不解释运势意义的原始
|
||||
数据输出;一旦解释财富运势、收入窗口、到账、资产或变现,必须执行 MEVG 与真实案例校正。
|
||||
|
||||
示例 verdict:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -197,3 +211,5 @@
|
||||
- 把纸面估值误当成流动性到账
|
||||
- 未说明 birth time precision
|
||||
- 未说明 `Ayanamsa / Node mode`
|
||||
- 未完成 `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||||
- 未完成 `Real Case Calibration`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -48,14 +48,22 @@
|
||||
23. 是否把外部 oracle 未闭环的前线(Dasha boundary / Shadbala absolute / Tajika annual)说清楚?
|
||||
24. 是否避免把内部一致性伪装成传统软件级真值冻结?
|
||||
|
||||
## H. 输出层
|
||||
## H. MEVG 与真实案例层
|
||||
|
||||
25. 是否输出 `Technique Audit Table` 或等价审计表?
|
||||
26. 是否给出 `used / partial / blocked / not used` 级别说明?
|
||||
27. 是否给出置信度,而不是只给断语?
|
||||
28. 是否把 must-not-overclaim 边界说清楚?
|
||||
25. 是否执行 `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`,即全球 / 全网外部资料采集?
|
||||
26. 是否给出 `Real Case Calibration`,即真实案例参考、公开 benchmark case,或明确 case gap?
|
||||
27. 是否标出 source tier,而不是把论坛、博客、经典文本、开源项目和黑盒 oracle 混成同一权重?
|
||||
28. 若来源冲突,是否做了 conflict arbitration,并说明哪条结论被降级?
|
||||
29. 是否正确使用 pure calculation exemption:只在纯计算、纯代码、纯项目维护或未解释运势意义的原始数据输出时豁免?
|
||||
|
||||
## I. 输出层
|
||||
|
||||
30. 是否输出 `Technique Audit Table` 或等价审计表?
|
||||
31. 是否给出 `used / partial / blocked / not used` 级别说明?
|
||||
32. 是否给出置信度,而不是只给断语?
|
||||
33. 是否把 must-not-overclaim 边界说清楚?
|
||||
|
||||
## 一句话用法
|
||||
|
||||
只要这张表里有 3-4 项没过,就不要把输出包装成“高严谨结论”。
|
||||
只要 `参数层 + 承诺层 + 分盘层 + timing 层 + 外部真值边界` 没一起过,就不能把 skill 说成“已经无疏漏封顶”。
|
||||
只要 `参数层 + 承诺层 + 分盘层 + timing 层 + 外部真值边界 + MEVG 与真实案例层` 没一起过,就不能把 skill 说成“已经无疏漏封顶”。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +31,33 @@ If any of the above cannot be completed because of missing birth precision, exte
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 0.6 Existing MEVG Invocation Gate
|
||||
|
||||
This router reuses the existing MEVG source of truth in
|
||||
`references/mandatory-verification-gate-protocol.md`; it does not create a
|
||||
second verification system.
|
||||
|
||||
For **all chart interpretation readings**, including natal interpretation,
|
||||
career, wealth, relationship, health, annual/monthly timing, event prediction,
|
||||
rectification support, and technique reliability questions, the reading must
|
||||
complete or explicitly block:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`: global web evidence collection, source tiering,
|
||||
and conflict arbitration.
|
||||
2. `Real Case Calibration`: real case reference, benchmark case reference, or a
|
||||
clear case-gap statement with confidence downgrade.
|
||||
|
||||
The only exemption is: pure calculation / code / project-maintenance tasks are exempt
|
||||
when they do not interpret chart meaning. Examples: running tests, checking Git
|
||||
status, fixing code, or returning raw degrees / Dasha boundaries without any
|
||||
fortune interpretation. Once the answer explains what the chart means, the
|
||||
exemption no longer applies.
|
||||
|
||||
Every Level 2+ chart reading must include `MEVG / Global Web Evidence` and
|
||||
`Real Case Calibration` in the Technique Audit Table.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Question router
|
||||
|
||||
| User intent | Route | Required depth |
|
||||
@@ -58,7 +85,8 @@ For every Level 2+ reading, complete or explicitly mark unavailable:
|
||||
- Transit: Saturn/Jupiter/Rahu-Ketu, plus Moon trigger for month/day-level timing.
|
||||
- Functional benefic/malefic status by Lagna.
|
||||
- Shadbala and Ashtakavarga when a claim depends on planetary strength or transit strength.
|
||||
- MEVG external verification for non-obvious interpretive claims.
|
||||
- MEVG external verification for all interpretive chart-reading claims.
|
||||
- Real case calibration or a clearly marked case-evidence gap.
|
||||
- Confidence label: A/B/C/insufficient.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@@ -207,6 +235,8 @@ Every Level 2+ output must include this table near the end.
|
||||
| Argala | Used / not used | ... | ... |
|
||||
| KP / Sub-lord | Used / not required / unavailable | ... | ... |
|
||||
| Historical verification | Used / not provided | ... | ... |
|
||||
| MEVG / Global Web Evidence | Used / blocked / exempt for pure calculation | Source tier, searches, conflict arbitration | Mandatory for all chart interpretation readings; blocked or downgraded if omitted |
|
||||
| Real Case Calibration | Used / blocked / case gap | Real case, benchmark case, or documented lack of matching cases | Cap confidence when no comparable case evidence is available |
|
||||
|
||||
Never omit unavailable techniques silently. Mark them as unavailable or not integrated.
|
||||
When Functional Benefic/Malefic is used, explicitly surface the functional neutrals and yogakarakas instead of collapsing them into a generic summary.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -57,6 +57,18 @@
|
||||
|
||||
当动态预测(被发现/合作/破圈/关键事件型)时,**必须先执行案例检索**:
|
||||
|
||||
本节是 `references/mandatory-verification-gate-protocol.md` 的推运执行入口之一。
|
||||
所有 Transit / Dasha / 年运 / 月运 / 具体事件型推运结论,都必须在最终
|
||||
Technique Audit Table 中出现:
|
||||
|
||||
- `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`:记录全网外部资料采集、source tier 与
|
||||
conflict arbitration。
|
||||
- `Real Case Calibration`:记录真实案例参考、公开 benchmark case,或明确
|
||||
case gap。
|
||||
|
||||
pure calculation exemption 只适用于纯计算、纯代码、纯项目维护或不解释运势意义的
|
||||
原始数据输出;一旦解释 Transit 或 Dasha 对运势的意义,必须执行 MEVG 与真实案例校正。
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1:检索同类行星配置真实案例
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user