fix(staging): rotate SSH secret handling and env ownership
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2208,3 +2208,19 @@
|
||||
- 相关记录:BUG-126
|
||||
- 复发自:无
|
||||
- 修复版本:本次个人报告 staging 发布提交
|
||||
|
||||
## BUG-128 | staging deploy 泄漏多行 SSH secret 且 env owner 契约互相冲突
|
||||
|
||||
- 状态:resolved(local,pending quality-gate rerun)
|
||||
- 首次发现:2026-08-06
|
||||
- 最近更新:2026-08-06
|
||||
- 影响面:Gitea/GitHub staging deploy 与 migration workflow、staging SSH 凭据、`.env.staging*` owner、加密备份和发布门禁;production 未受影响。
|
||||
- 用户现象:exact-SHA 自动 deploy run `1464` 在应用切换前失败;Gitea job 日志把多行 staging SSH 私钥逐行显示,同时远端数据库 env validator 报 owner 不匹配。公网仍运行旧 SHA。
|
||||
- 触发条件:Gitea workflow 将多行 OpenSSH key 直接放入 step env;root 控制脚本验证一个由 `deploy` 持有的 mode-0600 env;此前 root rollout 临时文件又通过 `mv` 把 env owner 改成 root。
|
||||
- 根因:Gitea runner 不能可靠遮蔽多行 secret 的每一行;控制面同时混用了“当前脚本用户”和“部署树 owner”作为 env ownership 事实,rollout 覆盖文件时未保留原 owner/gid。
|
||||
- 修复:立即停止发布,生成并验证新 staging ED25519 key,精确撤销旧 authorized key,证明旧 key 无法登录,删除本地旧 key,更新 Gitea/GitHub staging secrets,并删除 28 个可能含旧 key 的 Gitea deploy/migration runs。`STAGING_SSH_PRIVATE_KEY` 改为单行 base64;所有 staging workflow 解码到 0600 临时文件并用 `ssh-keygen` 验证。deploy/migration 以部署树 UID 校验两个 env;backup helper 继续以 `deploy` 运行;rollout 临时文件显式保留部署树 owner/gid。
|
||||
- 验证:新 key 严格主机校验登录成功,旧 key 登录失败;新 Gitea/GitHub secrets 已更新;泄漏 run `1464` 已删除;focused workflow、owner、shell/YAML 和 governance tests 待本次提交执行,完整 staging gate/deploy 待新 exact SHA。
|
||||
- 防复发:禁止 staging workflow 直接注入多行私钥或打印 decoded secret 变量;env owner 必须由部署树身份决定,root 受控脚本不得用 root 临时文件改变持久 env owner。任何凭据日志暴露先轮换/撤销/清理,再修代码和重跑。
|
||||
- 相关记录:BUG-124、BUG-127、ERR-092、ERR-093、ERR-094
|
||||
- 复发自:无
|
||||
- 修复版本:待安全修复 PR 与 staging 验收
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -139,6 +139,12 @@ Before the personal-report staging migration, the encrypted backup helper correc
|
||||
|
||||
Prevention: before staging backup/migration, verify both env files are regular, non-symlink files owned by `deploy:deploy` with mode `0600`; restore only that documented owner/mode under the shared mutation lock, without printing or copying file contents. Run `backup-staging-postgres.sh` as `deploy`, never weaken its ancestor checks, never create a parallel root backup tree, and never broaden env permissions.
|
||||
|
||||
## ERR-094 | Gitea expanded a multiline staging SSH secret in failed workflow logs | mitigated 2026-08-06
|
||||
|
||||
A failed exact-SHA staging deploy displayed the multiline staging SSH private key in the job environment block instead of masking each line. Release mutations were stopped immediately. The staging-only key was rotated, the new key was verified before the exposed key was removed from `authorized_keys`, the old key was proven unable to authenticate and deleted locally, Gitea and GitHub staging secrets were replaced, and 28 potentially affected Gitea deploy/migration runs were deleted. The successful quality-gate run and immutable image manifest were retained because they never received the SSH secret.
|
||||
|
||||
Prevention: store `STAGING_SSH_PRIVATE_KEY` only as one unwrapped base64 line; workflows decode it into a mode-`0600` temporary key, validate it with `ssh-keygen`, and delete the temporary directory on every exit. Contract tests must reject direct multiline `SSH_PRIVATE_KEY` injection or `printf` of a decoded secret variable. A leaked staging key must be rotated and revoked before any rerun; production keys remain a separate boundary and were not involved in this incident.
|
||||
|
||||
## Fragment Sweep Command Set
|
||||
|
||||
## ERR-086 | Steve Jobs jyotishganit artifacts used non-San-Francisco coordinates | mitigated 2026-07-21
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user