4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
ClaudeandClaude Opus 5.5	9351b0b633	feat(report): Lagna Kendradi, Niryaana Shoola sub-periods and non-applicable conditional dashas, as in the upstream export ... Product decision 2026-11-06: follow the upstream export for these tables. - Lagna Kendradi: upstream profile kendradi_narayana_duration_candidate_v1 (Lagna sign, then kendra / panaphara / apoklima order, Narayana sign years, the same years Drig uses). Major periods only; labelled as not checked against a book example. - Niryaana Shoola: sub-periods forward from the MD sign, twelve equal parts; the research chapter adds the third level. Labelled: PVR gives no separate rule, comparison only. - Conditional dashas whose classical gate fails (Satabdika, Shodashottari, Dwadashottari, Dwisaptatisama, Panchottari, Chaturshitisama) get a separate reference copy with the existing standard-table profile. The reading's own modules stay not_applicable, so consultation, convergence and rectification are unchanged; the report states the unmet condition. Tests that locked the old omissions are updated with 原值/新值/原因. Pre-work ledger: notes from this session (restore, CRLF files, baseline failures). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DbBXoyeZrYn6ryNcSe5Y2Y	2026-11-06 17:39:39 +08:00
ClaudeandClaude Opus 5.5	8f83eb2c25	fix(report): Kalachakra uses the classical sign periods from the Moon longitude (BUG-1656) ... The full reading and the dasha registry called the Kalachakra module without the Moon longitude, so BUG-1487's PVR ch.24 sign periods never ran in the product. The report printed the legacy approximation (planet lords, 7..18 years) under a "simplified model" label. Both callers now pass the Moon longitude. The dasha family carries method_profile. Classical results keep their own AD/PD rows instead of the rotated simplified table, and the reader and research tables list signs. The PyJHora comparison was rerun: majors now agree, sub-period division still differs (documented). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DbBXoyeZrYn6ryNcSe5Y2Y	2026-11-06 17:23:21 +08:00
jesse-uxandGrok (agent loop)	a757af6b4e	标出研究章和 PyJHora 的已知差别（#92）。 ... 10 张虚构盘逐体系对照。不一致的方法在标题下写明差在哪一类。本命 Tithi 顺行一致，逆行没有公开函数。Windows 上 1970 年以前的日出不再用 fromtimestamp。 自测：合同与研究章测试通过；200 张英文扫描约 1956 秒通过。未跑全量 pytest、快速门和前端。 Co-Authored-By: Grok (agent loop)	2026-10-23 22:29:52 +08:00
jesse-uxandGrok (agent loop)	d45e65a9ec	完整数据版补上研究口径的推运、次小运和细分盘（#92）。 ... 研究章在渲染时计算，不写入资料包。四种星座大运次小运和 Kalachakra 第三层不改原来的主运、子运。D81、D108、D144 只留在研究章。 自测：test_research_timing、星座大运、域读取、卫生预算、真恒星、jhora 扫描、API 增长、六章标题、英文版。三张虚构盘中英出稿都低于 180 秒。PyJHora 已导入但未做逐层对照。 Co-Authored-By: Grok (agent loop)	2026-10-23 18:20:44 +08:00