七条路由的证据门都不是自己的:route_requirements 的键写成 relationship/finance,而 路由名是 marriage/wealth,另有 5 条路由压根没有条目,全部静默落到 general 的门。 missingLayers: [] 因此不表示证据齐备,只表示没检查过——婚姻的 UL 与财富的 D2 从未 进入检查。 同一函数另有两处判据也没接到权威来源。7 块正则用问题文本重猜领域,而领域早已由模型 声明并写进 route_packet,一句写作「情感」而非表里「感情」的提问在 marriage 路由上完全 拿不到性别解读边界。timing_layers_ready 读的是 missing_route_layers,该列表只装本路由 要求的层,于是对任何不要求 narayana_dasha 的路由恒为真,精确应期在该层根本没算出来时 也照样放行。三处的失败方向都是静默放宽,因此没有任何人报错。 三处都接回权威来源:10 条路由逐条显式列出必需层(层名限定为证据包真实构建的 section, 所以 wealth 不要求引擎不产出的 D11)、领域边界按 route 查表、出生时间边界从矫正闸门的 effective_accuracy 与 Lagna 敏感度派生、就绪判断直接读 section 状态。唯一保留文本探测 的是「用户有没有要一个具体日期」——服务端对此没有权威来源,改为 timing/annual 路由结构 性携带、文本仅作叠加,一次措辞漏判不再能把信号清零。 另外把 skillReferenceReadCount 暴露为回执的 skill.referenceReads(必填)与可观测日志的 skillReferenceReads。它此前数完即丢,而 skill_read 按设计不记成 runtime step,因此「模型 有没有真的翻开方法文档」在运行结束后无处可查。 Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
117 lines
5.4 KiB
TypeScript
117 lines
5.4 KiB
TypeScript
import { z } from "zod";
|
|
import { consultationDomainSchema, type ConsultationDomain } from "./consultation-domain-registry.ts";
|
|
|
|
export const publicActivityPhaseSchema = z.enum([
|
|
"loading-method",
|
|
"chart-calculation",
|
|
"evidence-validation",
|
|
"answer-composition",
|
|
]);
|
|
export type PublicActivityPhase = z.infer<typeof publicActivityPhaseSchema>;
|
|
|
|
export type WorkflowReceipt = Readonly<{
|
|
route: string;
|
|
status: string;
|
|
preciseTiming: string;
|
|
missingLayers: readonly string[];
|
|
domains?: readonly ConsultationDomain[];
|
|
// Requested but not calculated, because the run's wall clock could not pay
|
|
// for them. Present so a partial plan cannot be read as a complete one.
|
|
omittedDomains?: readonly ConsultationDomain[];
|
|
}>;
|
|
|
|
export const workflowReceiptSchema: z.ZodType<WorkflowReceipt> = z.object({
|
|
route: z.string().max(120),
|
|
status: z.string().max(120),
|
|
preciseTiming: z.string().max(120),
|
|
missingLayers: z.array(z.string().max(120)).max(30),
|
|
domains: z.array(consultationDomainSchema).min(1).max(6).optional(),
|
|
omittedDomains: z.array(consultationDomainSchema).min(1).max(6).optional(),
|
|
}).strict();
|
|
|
|
const executionStepSchema = z.object({
|
|
sequence: z.number().int().min(1).max(32),
|
|
kind: z.enum(["skill", "tool", "validation"]),
|
|
name: z.string().max(120),
|
|
status: z.enum(["completed", "failed"]),
|
|
durationMs: z.number().int().min(0).optional(),
|
|
}).strict();
|
|
|
|
const stepBudgetSchema = z.object({
|
|
planned: z.number().int().min(1).max(32),
|
|
used: z.number().int().min(0).max(32),
|
|
remaining: z.number().int().min(0).max(32),
|
|
truncated: z.boolean(),
|
|
}).strict();
|
|
|
|
export const agentExecutionReceiptSchema = z.object({
|
|
runId: z.string().min(1).max(120),
|
|
runtime: z.literal("mastra-agentic"),
|
|
skill: z.object({
|
|
name: z.literal("jyotish-vedic-astrology"),
|
|
loaded: z.boolean(),
|
|
version: z.string().max(120).optional(),
|
|
// How many reference documents the model opened after loading the skill. Required rather than
|
|
// optional: the count was tracked in runtime state and surfaced nowhere, so "did the model
|
|
// consult the method at all" was unanswerable from a finished run. Zero is a real answer.
|
|
referenceReads: z.number().int().min(0).max(64),
|
|
}).strict(),
|
|
steps: z.array(executionStepSchema).max(32),
|
|
stepBudget: stepBudgetSchema.optional(),
|
|
workflow: workflowReceiptSchema,
|
|
techniqueTruth: z.string().max(120).optional(),
|
|
}).strict();
|
|
export type AgentExecutionReceipt = z.infer<typeof agentExecutionReceiptSchema>;
|
|
|
|
const runStartedSchema = z.object({ type: z.literal("run.started"), runId: z.string(), requestId: z.string() }).strict();
|
|
const skillStartedSchema = z.object({ type: z.literal("skill.started"), name: z.literal("jyotish-vedic-astrology") }).strict();
|
|
const skillCompletedSchema = z.object({ type: z.literal("skill.completed"), name: z.literal("jyotish-vedic-astrology") }).strict();
|
|
const toolStartedSchema = z.object({ type: z.literal("tool.started"), callId: z.string(), tool: z.literal("run-jyotish-consultation"), label: z.string() }).strict();
|
|
const activitySchema = z.object({ type: z.literal("activity"), phase: publicActivityPhaseSchema, label: z.string().max(120) }).strict();
|
|
const toolCompletedSchema = z.object({
|
|
type: z.literal("tool.completed"), callId: z.string(), tool: z.literal("run-jyotish-consultation"),
|
|
status: z.enum(["ready", "degraded", "blocked"]), durationMs: z.number().int().min(0),
|
|
}).strict();
|
|
const toolFailedSchema = z.object({
|
|
type: z.literal("tool.failed"), callId: z.string(), tool: z.literal("run-jyotish-consultation"),
|
|
code: z.enum(["calculation_failed", "timeout", "cancelled"]),
|
|
}).strict();
|
|
const answerDeltaSchema = z.object({ type: z.literal("answer.delta"), text: z.string() }).strict();
|
|
const runCompletedSchema = z.object({ type: z.literal("run.completed"), receipt: agentExecutionReceiptSchema }).strict();
|
|
// A failure is the case the receipt is most needed for, so it carries the same
|
|
// allowlisted receipt a completed run does. It stays optional because the
|
|
// receipt is built from live state that a hard failure may leave unparseable,
|
|
// and losing the whole failure event would be worse than losing its receipt.
|
|
const runFailedSchema = z.object({
|
|
type: z.literal("run.failed"),
|
|
code: z.enum(["runtime_contract_incomplete", "calculation_failed", "empty_answer", "cancelled"]),
|
|
message: z.string().max(200),
|
|
receipt: agentExecutionReceiptSchema.optional(),
|
|
}).strict();
|
|
|
|
export const consultationAgentPublicEventSchema = z.discriminatedUnion("type", [
|
|
runStartedSchema, skillStartedSchema, skillCompletedSchema, toolStartedSchema, activitySchema,
|
|
toolCompletedSchema, toolFailedSchema, answerDeltaSchema, runCompletedSchema, runFailedSchema,
|
|
]);
|
|
export type ConsultationAgentPublicEvent = z.infer<typeof consultationAgentPublicEventSchema>;
|
|
|
|
export function createNdjsonParser(onEvent: (event: ConsultationAgentPublicEvent) => void) {
|
|
let buffer = "";
|
|
function consume(value: string, final: boolean) {
|
|
buffer += value;
|
|
const lines = buffer.split("\n");
|
|
buffer = lines.pop() ?? "";
|
|
for (const line of lines) {
|
|
if (line.trim()) onEvent(consultationAgentPublicEventSchema.parse(JSON.parse(line)));
|
|
}
|
|
if (final && buffer.trim()) {
|
|
onEvent(consultationAgentPublicEventSchema.parse(JSON.parse(buffer)));
|
|
buffer = "";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return Object.freeze({
|
|
push: (value: string) => consume(value, false),
|
|
finish: (value = "") => consume(value, true),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|