ef1bd6dfa9
The report writer had no interpretation methodology at all: a local agent calling the jyotish skill can read the reference library, the report model could read nothing. It could only restate the bundle. - frontend/src/lib/report-interpretation-packs/ holds one general pack and one pack per report theme, distilled from the in-repo reference guides. They constrain wording and reasoning discipline (term modernisation, how to talk about relative strength and SAV scores, the reasoning errors to avoid, the banned phrasings) and never assert a chart fact. - The general pack rides INSIDE the cached system message so the cached prefix stays byte-identical across sections; the chapter pack follows it and summary calls get the general pack only. - Skill jyotish-personal-report goes to 1.1.0 (1.0.0 deprecated): the contract now names interpretiveFacts and themeNarrativeSeeds as a bounded fact layer and states that the knowledge pack is not a fact source and cannot raise certainty. - Telemetry records interpretiveFactCount and knowledgePackCharacters as numbers only; the counter never throws so telemetry cannot break a run. Tests lock every theme resolving a pack, the 3,000 character budget, a forbidden-substring scan (paths, module names, vendor names, artefact names), the byte-stable cache prefix, and that no evidence id or date appears in the static content. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016P5RoqzmUQEbeC2qjAkeGr