医院记录那一分钟落在校正区间外时,交付卡以前只说一句「相差 N 分钟」:
没说默认按哪个时间排盘,采用按钮也仍写中性的「更像这个」,用户看不出
点下去会把之后的排盘换成另一分钟。
产品负责人 2026-09-14 拍板「记录优先,分歧如实呈现」:
- 冲突文案补满三层——默认仍按出生记录时间排盘、经历指向另一段时间相差
N 分钟、两条路都可以走。
- 冲突态采用按钮改「改用校正结果」,按钮下按列写明
「选它之后,排盘会从出生记录时间 hh:mm 换成 hh:mm」。
- 新增 FORBIDDEN_RECORD_VERDICT_PHRASE 锁住 D4:不得宣布记录不准,
也不得宣布校正结果无效。
只改文案层与采用入口措辞。打分、判据、采用 RPC、置信度与确认门控、
数据库一律未动;不新增入口、不加确认弹窗;记录落在范围内或来源是
「大概时间 / 时间段」时卡片与今天完全一致。Skill 未 bump,只补
references §6.1。
验收:tsc 0 错;lint 0 error;npm test 3335 项 fail 31,失败清单与基线
37e6c519 逐条一致(全部是无 Docker / 无外网的既有环境缺口);next build
通过且 / 仍 ○ Static;首屏 chunks gzip +269 B(+0.019%)。
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JUei7K13cYxLHE3Axe4A45
211 lines
8.5 KiB
TypeScript
211 lines
8.5 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* BUG-691 · 记录与校正区间冲突时:记录优先,分歧如实呈现。
|
|
*
|
|
* 产品拍板(2026-09-14):默认仍按出生记录时间排盘,但校正结果必须并列呈现,
|
|
* 系统不得宣布任何一方无效。本文件锁的是文案层与采用入口措辞,不涉及打分与采用逻辑。
|
|
*/
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import test from "node:test";
|
|
import { createElement } from "react";
|
|
import { renderToStaticMarkup } from "react-dom/server";
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
FORBIDDEN_RECORD_VERDICT_PHRASE,
|
|
SWITCH_TO_RECTIFIED_LABEL,
|
|
recordRangeConflict,
|
|
reportedTimeOffsetCopy,
|
|
switchToRectifiedConfirmCopy,
|
|
} from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/birth-time-provenance.ts";
|
|
import { buildRangeDelivery } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/divergence-panel.ts";
|
|
import { RectificationRangeDelivery } from "../src/components/rectification-range-delivery.tsx";
|
|
import { RECTIFICATION_USER_COPY } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/user-copy.ts";
|
|
import { INFERENCE_ALGORITHM_VERSION, type InferenceCandidate, type InferenceState } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/core/types.ts";
|
|
import type { RectificationCandidateResult } from "../src/lib/rectification-candidate-result.ts";
|
|
|
|
const RANGE = ["04:48", "05:07"] as const;
|
|
/** Outside RANGE by 5 minutes — the conflict case. */
|
|
const RECORD_OUTSIDE = "05:12";
|
|
/** Inside RANGE — must keep the pre-BUG-691 wording. */
|
|
const RECORD_INSIDE = "05:00";
|
|
|
|
function cand(time: string, probability: number): InferenceCandidate {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: time,
|
|
time,
|
|
cluster_range: [RANGE[0], RANGE[1]],
|
|
prior_score: probability * 100,
|
|
posterior_score: probability * 100,
|
|
probability,
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
rank: 1,
|
|
strong_conflict_count: 0,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function inference(): InferenceState {
|
|
return {
|
|
algorithm_version: INFERENCE_ALGORITHM_VERSION,
|
|
candidate_set_id: "set",
|
|
revision: 1,
|
|
phase: "discrimination",
|
|
result_status: "credible_range",
|
|
range_start: RANGE[0],
|
|
range_end: RANGE[1],
|
|
candidates: [cand("04:53", 0.4), cand("04:50", 0.35)],
|
|
events: [],
|
|
probes: [],
|
|
answered_probes: [],
|
|
rounds: [],
|
|
entropy: 1,
|
|
representative_time: "04:53",
|
|
credible_range: [RANGE[0], RANGE[1]],
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function delivery(reportedBirthTime: string, birthTimeSource: string) {
|
|
return buildRangeDelivery({
|
|
inference: inference(),
|
|
publicCandidates: [
|
|
{ candidateId: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaa1", time: "04:53" },
|
|
{ candidateId: "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbb2", time: "04:50" },
|
|
],
|
|
credibleRange: [RANGE[0], RANGE[1]],
|
|
representativeTime: "04:53",
|
|
reportedBirthTime,
|
|
birthTimeSource,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function deliveryResult(built: ReturnType<typeof buildRangeDelivery>): RectificationCandidateResult {
|
|
return {
|
|
resultId: "result-record-conflict",
|
|
candidates: built.columns.map((column, index) => ({
|
|
candidateId: column.candidate_id,
|
|
rank: index + 1,
|
|
time: column.time,
|
|
relativeSupport: column.probability_percent,
|
|
tiedMinuteCount: 1,
|
|
})),
|
|
overallConfidence: "medium",
|
|
selectionAllowed: true,
|
|
canAdopt: true,
|
|
confirmationAllowed: false,
|
|
decisionReceipt: null,
|
|
representativeTime: built.representative_time,
|
|
selectedTime: null,
|
|
selectionKind: null,
|
|
houseTable: null,
|
|
houseTablesByTime: {},
|
|
natalRecast: null,
|
|
techniqueAudit: [],
|
|
windowTransitions: [],
|
|
eventDashaLedger: [],
|
|
dashaAgreement: null,
|
|
lagnaContrast: null,
|
|
nakshatraBoundary: null,
|
|
precisionStage: null,
|
|
oosBlindPrompts: [],
|
|
confirmationGate: { confirmation_allowed: false } as RectificationCandidateResult["confirmationGate"],
|
|
validated: false,
|
|
completionStatus: null,
|
|
sessionOutcome: "adopt_representative",
|
|
credibleRange: built.range,
|
|
rangeDelivery: built,
|
|
verificationReportMarkdown: built.verification_markdown,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function html(reportedBirthTime: string, birthTimeSource: string): string {
|
|
return renderToStaticMarkup(createElement(RectificationRangeDelivery, {
|
|
result: deliveryResult(delivery(reportedBirthTime, birthTimeSource)),
|
|
acceptingCandidateId: null,
|
|
readonly: false,
|
|
onAccept: () => undefined,
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test("conflict is only a hospital record that falls outside the range", () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
recordRangeConflict({ source: "hospital_record", reportedTime: RECORD_OUTSIDE, range: RANGE }),
|
|
{ reportedTime: RECORD_OUTSIDE, gapMinutes: 5 },
|
|
);
|
|
// Inside the range there is nothing to reconcile.
|
|
assert.equal(recordRangeConflict({ source: "hospital_record", reportedTime: RECORD_INSIDE, range: RANGE }), null);
|
|
// The other two sources are already declared approximate, so they cannot conflict.
|
|
assert.equal(recordRangeConflict({ source: "approximate", reportedTime: RECORD_OUTSIDE, range: RANGE }), null);
|
|
assert.equal(recordRangeConflict({ source: "period_only", reportedTime: RECORD_OUTSIDE, range: RANGE }), null);
|
|
// Missing or unusable inputs are not a conflict.
|
|
assert.equal(recordRangeConflict({ source: "hospital_record", reportedTime: RECORD_OUTSIDE, range: null }), null);
|
|
assert.equal(recordRangeConflict({ source: "hospital_record", reportedTime: "", range: RANGE }), null);
|
|
assert.equal(recordRangeConflict({ source: "hospital_record", reportedTime: "25:99", range: RANGE }), null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("conflict copy states record-first default, the divergence, and the user's choice", () => {
|
|
const copy = reportedTimeOffsetCopy({
|
|
source: "hospital_record",
|
|
reportedTime: RECORD_OUTSIDE,
|
|
range: RANGE,
|
|
representativeTime: "04:53",
|
|
}) ?? "";
|
|
// D2 ①: the chart still uses the record until the user says otherwise.
|
|
assert.match(copy, /出生记录时间 05:12/);
|
|
assert.match(copy, /默认仍按这个时间排盘/);
|
|
// D2 ②: the evidence points somewhere else, and the gap is named.
|
|
assert.match(copy, /指向另一段时间/);
|
|
assert.match(copy, /相差 5 分钟/);
|
|
// D2 ③: both doors stay open.
|
|
assert.match(copy, /改用校正结果/);
|
|
assert.match(copy, /继续用记录/);
|
|
// D4: neither side may be declared invalid.
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(copy, FORBIDDEN_RECORD_VERDICT_PHRASE);
|
|
// BUG-587: adoption is never described as a confirmed minute.
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(copy, /已确认|确定就是|唯一出生分钟是/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("a record inside the range keeps the pre-BUG-691 wording", () => {
|
|
const copy = reportedTimeOffsetCopy({
|
|
source: "hospital_record",
|
|
reportedTime: RECORD_INSIDE,
|
|
range: RANGE,
|
|
representativeTime: "04:53",
|
|
}) ?? "";
|
|
assert.equal(copy, "出生记录时间 05:00,落在目前范围内");
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(copy, /改用校正结果/);
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(copy, FORBIDDEN_RECORD_VERDICT_PHRASE);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("conflict swaps the adopt entry wording and says which clock replaces which", () => {
|
|
const conflict = html(RECORD_OUTSIDE, "hospital_record");
|
|
assert.ok(conflict.includes(SWITCH_TO_RECTIFIED_LABEL));
|
|
assert.equal(conflict.includes(RECTIFICATION_USER_COPY.rangeDeliveryMoreLikeThis), false);
|
|
// The confirmation line is per column, so each button names its own target minute.
|
|
assert.ok(conflict.includes(switchToRectifiedConfirmCopy(RECORD_OUTSIDE, "04:53")));
|
|
assert.ok(conflict.includes(switchToRectifiedConfirmCopy(RECORD_OUTSIDE, "04:50")));
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(conflict, FORBIDDEN_RECORD_VERDICT_PHRASE);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("non-conflict states keep 更像这个 and show no switch note", () => {
|
|
for (const [reported, source] of [
|
|
[RECORD_INSIDE, "hospital_record"],
|
|
[RECORD_OUTSIDE, "approximate"],
|
|
[RECORD_OUTSIDE, "period_only"],
|
|
] as const) {
|
|
const markup = html(reported, source);
|
|
assert.ok(markup.includes(RECTIFICATION_USER_COPY.rangeDeliveryMoreLikeThis), `${reported}/${source}`);
|
|
assert.equal(markup.includes(SWITCH_TO_RECTIFIED_LABEL), false, `${reported}/${source}`);
|
|
assert.equal(markup.includes("换成 04:53"), false, `${reported}/${source}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("record_conflict survives the projection round trip and stays adopt-logic free", () => {
|
|
const built = delivery(RECORD_OUTSIDE, "hospital_record");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(built.record_conflict, { reported_time: RECORD_OUTSIDE, gap_minutes: 5 });
|
|
assert.equal(delivery(RECORD_INSIDE, "hospital_record").record_conflict, null);
|
|
// Adoption itself is untouched: the same candidates stay selectable either way.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
built.columns.map((column) => column.candidate_id),
|
|
delivery(RECORD_INSIDE, "hospital_record").columns.map((column) => column.candidate_id),
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(built.representative_time, delivery(RECORD_INSIDE, "hospital_record").representative_time);
|
|
});
|