fix: keep rectification narratives moving

This commit is contained in:
Jesse_Chen
2026-07-26 20:11:53 +08:00
parent 6320afbf5d
commit 380aba4628
4 changed files with 58 additions and 8 deletions
+14
View File
@@ -1489,3 +1489,17 @@
- 防复发:普通聊天的可见措辞不得由技术 packet 或事件台账驱动;内部收敛状态只能记录和计算,不能成为 Agent 每轮必须复述的脚本。
- 相关记录:BUG-074、BUG-075、BUG-078、BUG-079
- 修复版本:本次修复提交
## BUG-081 | 开放叙事只共情不继续引导
- 状态:resolved
- 首次发现:2026-07-26
- 最近更新:2026-07-26
- 影响面:生时校正开放叙事的中间轮回复
- 用户现象:用户讲完一段包含明确行动与转折的经历后,Agent 只分析感受和性格,没有自然询问后续经历,对话停在原地。
- 根因:为消除问卷式强制追问,中间轮 prompt 将提问设为完全可选,且校验器只检查已有问题是否可见,没有要求事件轮承担继续引导叙事的职责。
- 修复:普通中间轮 prompt 要求在本轮新事件后以一个贴着上下文的开放问题收尾;优先询问事件之后的下一步,继续禁止机械补年月、结果或转折。若模型仍只共情不引导,服务端直接补一句开放问题,不增加第二次模型调用;无模型可用时的安全兜底也保留自然后续问题。
- 验证:回归覆盖“研究院实习后因价值观冲突辞职”场景,确认只共情不引导的回复会保留原文并补上后续问题,且不触发模型重试。
- 防复发:开放叙事不等于被动倾听;事件轮默认负责自然推进,但不得恢复固定问卷模板。
- 相关记录:BUG-075、BUG-080
- 修复版本:本次修复提交
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ function promptFor(
rules: [
"优先回应用户话里的真实内容、感受、选择或转折,不要复述成档案摘要。",
"除非用户主动询问校时进度或技术结果,不要说已记录、先记为、对校时有价值、参与候选时间核对、不会因单一事件确认分钟,也不要主动谈候选范围、分盘、评分、收敛或内部处理。",
"不必每轮提问。需要提问时只问自然推进对话真正需要的问题,不要机械补年月、结果或转折。",
"用户刚提供实际经历时,回应之后必须用一个贴着上下文的开放问题收尾,自然引导他继续往后讲;优先问这件事之后发生了什么、接下来去了哪里或做了什么,不要机械补年月、结果或转折。",
"只返回 narrative 和 evidenceRequest。没有在 narrative 中逐字提出一个用户可见的明确问题时,evidenceRequest 必须为 null;若提出问题,evidenceRequest.prompt 必须与 narrative 中的问题文字完全一致。followUp 只表达 kind、answerMode 和 proposedDate,不要生成 evidenceId,目标事件由服务器绑定。",
],
retryIssues: boundedReceiptIssues(retryIssues),
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ function promptFor(
function fallbackNarrative(packet: RectificationTechnicalPacket, phase: RectificationNarrativePhase): string {
const candidate = packet.candidate;
if (phase === "intermediate") {
return "我听到了。你可以顺着这段经历继续说,也可以自然讲下一件想到的事。";
return "我听到了。你愿意接着说说这件事之后发生了什么吗?";
}
const phaseLine = phase === "final" && candidate.status === "ready_for_confirmation"
? "当前证据已形成候选总结,但仍有残余不确定性;只有明确确认后才会替换当前排盘时间。"
@@ -812,11 +812,21 @@ export async function generateRectificationNarrative(input: {
), { signal, attempt });
const modelId = modelIdSchema.parse(generated.modelId ?? defaultModelId);
const parsedOutput = parseModelOutput(generated.text, input.packet, input.context ?? {});
const output = input.phase === "intermediate"
const withoutHiddenFollowUp = input.phase === "intermediate"
&& parsedOutput.evidenceRequest
&& !/[?]/u.test(parsedOutput.narrative)
? { ...parsedOutput, evidenceRequest: null }
: parsedOutput;
const output = input.phase === "intermediate"
&& input.context?.latestEvidence?.length
&& !technicalDiscussionRequestPattern.test(input.context.latestUserText ?? "")
&& !/[?]/u.test(withoutHiddenFollowUp.narrative)
? {
...withoutHiddenFollowUp,
narrative: `${withoutHiddenFollowUp.narrative.trim()}\n\n这件事之后,紧接着发生了什么?`,
evidenceRequest: null,
}
: withoutHiddenFollowUp;
const validation = validateNarrativeAgainstPacket(
output,
input.packet,
@@ -455,17 +455,43 @@ test("passes the user's latest words to an ordinary intermediate reply", async (
}],
},
generator: generator([{
narrative: "第一次长期离开家去工作,适应过程应该不轻松。你可以接着讲。",
narrative: "第一次长期离开家去工作,适应过程应该不轻松。后来最先发生了什么?",
evidenceRequest: null,
}], prompts),
});
assert.match(prompts[0] ?? "", /离开家乡去上海开始第一份长期工作/);
assert.match(prompts[0] ?? "", /不要把自己写成记录员/);
assert.match(prompts[0] ?? "", /必须用一个贴着上下文的开放问题收尾/);
assert.doesNotMatch(prompts[0] ?? "", /latestEvidence/);
assert.doesNotMatch(prompts[0] ?? "", /候选范围.*05:16/);
});
test("adds a lightweight guide when an event reply only empathizes", async () => {
const prompts: string[] = [];
const result = await generateRectificationNarrative({
phase: "intermediate",
packet: syntheticTechnicalPacket(),
context: {
latestUserText: "实习到10月份,发现有人抢项目骗经费,我就辞职了",
latestEvidence: [{
dateLabel: "2020-10",
summary: "因价值观冲突辞职",
domain: "career",
}],
},
generator: generator([{
narrative: "这段经历确实很冲击,也能理解你为什么不愿意继续留下。",
evidenceRequest: null,
}], prompts),
});
assert.equal(result.attempts, 1);
assert.equal(result.fallbackUsed, false);
assert.match(result.narrative, /这件事之后,紧接着发生了什么?$/);
assert.equal(prompts.length, 1);
});
test("keeps internal event domains and suggested-domain routing out of the narrator context", async () => {
const prompts: string[] = [];
await generateRectificationNarrative({
@@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ test("a rejected intermediate narrative falls back without discarding the event"
const stored = value.cases.get(startActionId)?.row;
assert.equal(turn.turnVersion, 1);
assert.match(turn.narrative, /顺着这段经历继续说|自然讲下一件/);
assert.match(turn.narrative, /这件事之后.*发生了什么/);
assert.equal(stored?.privateCandidate.resultId, null);
assert.equal(stored?.eventEvidence.length, 1);
assert.equal(stored?.validationReceipts.length, 2);
@@ -1989,7 +1989,7 @@ test("vague, future, and unmatched answers stay conversational and never score",
}
});
test("a free Agent reply clears the previous structured question instead of inheriting it", async () => {
test("a free Agent reply clears the previous structured question and adds an open guide", async () => {
const value = harness({
readyAfterEvidenceCount: 99,
continueLatestEvent: true,
@@ -2010,7 +2010,7 @@ test("a free Agent reply clears the previous structured question instead of inhe
assert.equal(second.evidenceRequest, null);
assert.match(second.narrative, /顺着这段经历继续说|自然讲下一件/);
assert.doesNotMatch(second.narrative, /[?]/);
assert.match(second.narrative, /这件事之后,紧接着发生了什么?/);
});
test("a non-scoring packet failure responds to the current turn instead of replaying the prior agent message", async () => {
@@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ test("a failed regenerate saves a fallback turn without changing evidence, candi
const storedAfter = value.cases.get(startActionId)?.row;
assert.equal(regenerated.turnVersion, answered.turnVersion + 1);
assert.match(regenerated.narrative, /顺着这段经历继续说|自然讲下一件/);
assert.match(regenerated.narrative, /这件事之后.*发生了什么/);
assert.deepEqual(storedAfter?.eventEvidence, evidenceBefore);
assert.deepEqual(storedAfter?.privateCandidate, candidateBefore);
assert.equal(value.counts().reserveCount, countsBefore.reserveCount);