fix(rectification): stop re-asking covered domains after adopt (BUG-590, BUG-591)

Yearless-to-collect now skips domains already confirmed, declined, or asked; adopt-exhausted turns skip leftover collect persist. Collect focus collisions only retry with :next when collect_retry is set.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
 # 印度占星 Skill 更新日志
 
+## 2026-09-08 — 范围收到后不再把已答领域再问一遍
+
+生时校正把七个带年月领域和职业问完、范围已经收到、决策已是采用时，下一步是区间交付卡。不会再把已经答过的财务或其他领域采集题拿出来问。同一道采集题撞过题号时，也不会改个后缀再问一次。Skill 版本仍是 10.0.15。
+
+
 ## 2026-09-08 — 补经历后仍按已答对照题收范围，变宽会说出来
 
 生时校正答完对照卡后再补一件经历，会把已经答过的题按分钟重算进去，不会因为候选分钟换了两个就把范围弹回开工窗口。如果这次比较让范围变了，旁白末尾会写「范围从 A–B 变为 C–D」。Skill 版本仍是 10.0.15。

docs/BUG_HISTORY.md

@@ -9142,3 +9142,35 @@
 - 复发自：无
 - 修复版本：待提交（守卫已加，现象仍 investigating）
 
+## BUG-590 | 范围已收到 2 分钟、决策已是采用，却再问答过的财务采集题
+
+- 状态：resolved
+- 首次发现：2026-09-08
+- 最近更新：2026-09-08
+- 影响面：`method-followup.ts` 职业覆盖后的 yearless→采集分支、`shouldSkipFollowupPersist`、`holdoutFollowupFor`
+- 用户现象：范围已经收到大约 2 分钟，决策已是采用，输入框上方却再问一遍已经答过的财务采集题，区间交付卡出不来。
+- 触发条件：七个带年月领域和职业都覆盖或拒答；yearless 目录里还有无年份分盘对照（本例 D11 财务）；闲置路径带着 `contrastPacket` 持久化下一问；财务账本已有带年月确认事件且该领域采集焦点已 `resolved`。
+- 根因：职业覆盖后的 yearless→采集分支只取 `yearlessDiscriminators[0]`，只跳过拒答，不看该领域是否已有带年月事件、是否已经问过 `collect:<domain>:*`。财务已覆盖仍被改写成 dated collect。`shouldSkipFollowupPersist` 只要 `isRemainingEvidenceCollect` 为真就不跳过，采用被这道题挡住。holdout 的 `occupied` 不认 `health` / `health_pressure` 同义，答过健康后仍可能再问健康线。
+- 修复：遍历全部 yearless 对照，跳过拒答、已确认（含健康同义）和已问过采集的领域，全部跳过则不再派采集。采用且 `probe_pool_exhausted` 时，剩余采集只计「该领域没有确认事件且未拒答」的题，否则跳过持久化并写 `terminalNote`。holdout `occupied` 把 `health` 与 `health_pressure` 归并。不动采用门、确认门、Skill 版本（仍 10.0.15）。
+- 验证：`frontend/tests/rectification-occupation-coverage-exit.test.ts` 事故形状：yearless→采集 `next_followup === null`；迁居未覆盖仍问迁居；idle persist `terminalNote: true` 且 0 次 set-focus；agent-run 闸门轮与 `canShowRectificationSelectionCards`；holdout 健康同义。`frontend/tests/rectification-server-focus.test.ts` 见 BUG-591。`frontend` `tsc --noEmit` 0；指定 TS 切片 1006/0。
+- 防复发：yearless→采集不得只取第一道分盘题。已覆盖或已问过的领域不得再派 dated collect。采用穷尽时不得把已覆盖领域的采集当剩余采集挡住出卡。holdout occupied 必须与 `hasConfirmedHealth` 同口径。`USER_COLLECT_QUESTION.other` 不得回潮。
+- 相关记录：BUG-586、BUG-587、BUG-591
+- 复发自：BUG-586（同一「职业覆盖后多问一题」现象，不同分支）；BUG-587（收敛成功后才暴露）
+- 修复版本：待提交（`codex/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908`）
+
+## BUG-591 | 非 retry 采集焦点撞 id 时无条件加 `:next` 再插一次
+
+- 状态：resolved
+- 首次发现：2026-09-08
+- 最近更新：2026-09-08
+- 影响面：`server-focus.ts::persistCollectFocus`、`persistFocusAfterChoice`
+- 用户现象：财务采集题已经问过并关闭，下一轮仍以 `collect:finance:collect_method_evidence:next` 落库，题干与已答财务题相同。
+- 触发条件：计划层再次派出同一领域的非 `collect_retry` 采集题；`set_agentic_rectification_conversation_focus` 报 `focus_idempotency_conflict`。
+- 根因：`75fc456d`（BUG-462 附带）在撞 id 时一律改 `${questionId}:next` 再插，原本给穷尽采集撞开场题号用。BUG-586 删掉 other 穷尽采集后，这条路径只剩副作用：已覆盖领域只要被计划层重复派出，就能以 `:next` 落地。
+- 修复：撞 id 时仅 `followup.collect_retry === true` 才用 `:next`；否则返回 `duplicate_focus`、不插入。`persistFocusAfterChoice` 把 `duplicate_focus` 当已处理、不再读 dossier 重试。
+- 验证：`frontend/tests/rectification-server-focus.test.ts`：非 retry 冲突 `status: "duplicate_focus"` 且 RPC 一次；`collect_retry: true` 仍以 `:next` 落地。
+- 防复发：非 retry 采集撞 id 不得再加 `:next`。retry 采集仍须能以 `:next` 落地。
+- 相关记录：BUG-462、BUG-586、BUG-590
+- 复发自：BUG-462（`:next` 重试本为穷尽采集撞开场题号）
+- 修复版本：待提交（`codex/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908`）
+

docs/tasks/PROGRESS-rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# PROGRESS · 已覆盖领域再采集（2026-09-08）
+
+工作树：`.worktrees/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908`
+分支：`codex/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908`
+任务书：`docs/tasks/TASK-rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908.md`
+基线：`origin/staging` @ `43fd8875`
+
+本单状态：**待验收**。本提交交付到 staging。
+
+未改：采用门、确认门、`MIN_SEPARATION_LEAD`、`_relative_support`、`minute_step=1`、`SCORE_DELTA`、四选项合同、Skill 版本（仍 10.0.15）。
+
+## 做了什么
+
+- **决策 1** `method-followup.ts` 职业覆盖后的 yearless→采集：遍历全部 `yearlessDiscriminators`，跳过拒答、`hasConfirmedDomain`（含 `health`/`health_pressure`）和已问过 `collect:<domain>:*` 的领域。全部跳过则 `next` 保持空。
+- **决策 2** `shouldSkipFollowupPersist`：`canAdopt` 且（`nextAction === "ready_to_adopt"` 或 `sessionOutcome === "adopt_representative"`）且 `stopReason === "probe_pool_exhausted"` 时，`isRemainingEvidenceCollect` 只有该领域没有确认事件且未拒答才算剩余采集；否则跳过持久化、`terminalNote`。
+- **决策 3** `persistCollectFocus` 撞 `focus_idempotency_conflict`：仅 `collect_retry === true` 才 `:next`，否则 `duplicate_focus`。`persistFocusAfterChoice` 不再为 `duplicate_focus` 读 dossier 重试。
+- **决策 4** `holdoutFollowupFor` 的 occupied 归并 `health` / `health_pressure`。
+
+## 三栏（被触碰断言）
+
+| 用例 | 原值 | 新值 | 理由 |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| 事故形状 yearless→采集 | `next_followup.domain = finance`（取 yearless[0]=D11） | `null` | 决策 1，财务已覆盖 |
+| 同形状但迁居未覆盖 | finance | relocation | 守卫只跳过已覆盖领域 |
+| idle persist 事故形状 | 财务采集焦点 / `:next` | `terminalNote: true`，0 次 set-focus | 决策 1+2 |
+| 非 retry 采集撞 id | 任何撞 id 都 `:next` | `duplicate_focus`，RPC 一次 | 决策 3 |
+| `collect_retry` 撞 id | `:next` | 仍 `:next` | 保留 BUG-462 retry |
+| holdout 账本 `health` + oos `health_pressure` | `health_pressure` | `null` | 决策 4 |
+
+## 测试
+
+- `frontend` `./node_modules/.bin/tsc --noEmit`：exit 0
+- `npm run lint`：0 error（仓库既有 warning 未清）
+- 任务书指定 TS 切片（`tests/rectification-*.test.ts` + `agent-voice-copy-contract.test.ts`，排除 database）：**1006 passed / 0 failed**
+- Docker `database-rectification-*.test.ts`：本机未跑，记 blocked
+- `block_scan` 壁钟（BUG-570 P2）：既有缺口，本单不声称全量 Python 门通过
+- 浏览器七领域真人走查：无登录态，记环境缺口，见 `docs/testing/rectification-scenarios-20260907.md` §6
+
+## 偏离
+
+1. 任务书写 `nextAction === "adopt_representative"`。实现同时认 `ready_to_adopt` 与 `sessionOutcome === "adopt_representative"`，因为公开 nextAction 是前者。
+2. 验收形状扩在 `rectification-occupation-coverage-exit.test.ts`，没有新建文件。
+3. idle 夹具按解析后账本算 `evidenceLedgerFingerprint`，避免 RPC `summary` 与内存账本对不上把快照判成过期、决策掉回 `collect_evidence`。
+4. `rectification-eight-method.test.ts`：yearless D24 在 CLASSIC_COVERAGE 已有学业时，不再锁「再问一遍学业」；改为收未覆盖的财务。

docs/tasks/README.md

@@ -72,9 +72,10 @@
 | `TASK-rectification-stop-rescore-fix-20260907.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-stop-rescore-fix-20260907.md` | **P0**：BUG-579 的停止路径用「裸重算」（`rescoreMinuteAfterWindowChange` 不重建 `inference_state`、不重放已答探针、不写 transition），停止后范围变宽、卡片变成引擎裸支持度、采用 RPC 报 `candidate_state_inconsistent`；无框区分题经 `spokenCollectFallbackFollowup` 变成 domain=other 的采集题，再次冒出开场句 `GENERIC_COLLECT_QUESTION`；holdout 采集排在带年月采集之前 | 已验收通过（逻辑）；但同提交含区间卡 tsc 错，整体不可部署 | `ab57d03f`（BUG-581～582） |
 | `TASK-rectification-range-delivery-card-20260907.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-range-delivery-card-20260907.md` | 结尾重设计：四张分钟卡 + 相对支持度换成一张区间交付卡（范围、代表分钟、稳定/敏感主题、边界句）+ 只列未问 D9/D10/月宿分歧的 2～3 列对比面板（文案只取类型表），动作只有「按这个范围用 / 再补一件经历」；删交付旁白里三行预测窗口；Skill §9 口径改、bump 10.0.15 | **未通过**：tsc 1 错（判空顺序）；P2 预测窗口句兑现不了；P3 再补经历无提示 | `ab57d03f`；修复单 `TASK-rectification-range-delivery-fix-20260907.md` |
 | `TASK-rectification-range-delivery-fix-20260907.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-range-delivery-fix-20260907.md` | 区间卡修复单：`candidateResult` 判空提到最前（tsc 阻断）；预测窗口接到采用后首轮或删句；「再补一件经历」隐藏卡后给采集提示；进度记录须贴 tsc 原文 | 待验收 | `codex/rectification-range-delivery-fix-20260907`（BUG-583） |
-| `TASK-rectification-duplicate-narration-20260907.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-duplicate-narration-20260907.md` | 每轮采集旁白说两遍 + 题干在正文与问题块各一次：`step-answer` 的 set-focus 例外（BUG-533）放行了 set-focus 前后两个 step 的正文并拼接；`detachCollectSpokenAssistantText` 只剥逐字后缀，模型写进正文的问句没有代码守卫（BUG-488 防线只在提示词） | 待验收 | `codex/rectification-duplicate-narration-20260907`（BUG-584～585） |
-| `TASK-rectification-other-collect-fallback-20260908.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-other-collect-fallback-20260908.md` | 七领域问完落到「也可以再说一件」、职业题从未出现、不自动出卡：`USER_COLLECT_QUESTION.other` 仍有三条活路（职业焦点 `target_domain` 压成 other 后被 active-focus 承接 followup 重建；set-focus 两次无效兜底查表；无领域采集归 other），`collect:other:*` 焦点挂着让 `persistNextInterviewIfIdle` 的出卡路径永远不跑 | 待验收（2.2 触发链仍 investigating） | `codex/rectification-other-collect-fallback-20260908`（BUG-586） |
-| `TASK-rectification-probe-replay-loss-20260908.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-probe-replay-loss-20260908.md` | **P0** 收敛不了的直接原因：答完 5 道题范围收到 8 分钟，之后每补一件经历触发的重算换了候选集，`buildInferenceState` 找不到已答题定义（引擎与对照包按 asked keys 排除、状态 probes 不携带、分盘 key 内嵌分钟列表）→ `rounds:[]`、posterior=prior，交付回到 29 分钟；证据轮旁白不报范围变化；交付卡闪现待证实 | 待验收 | `codex/rectification-probe-replay-loss-20260908`（BUG-587～588；P3 闪现仍 investigating） |
+| `TASK-rectification-duplicate-narration-20260907.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-duplicate-narration-20260907.md` | 每轮采集旁白说两遍 + 题干在正文与问题块各一次：`step-answer` 的 set-focus 例外（BUG-533）放行了 set-focus 前后两个 step 的正文并拼接；`detachCollectSpokenAssistantText` 只剥逐字后缀，模型写进正文的问句没有代码守卫（BUG-488 防线只在提示词） | 已验收通过 | `9d1c08ca`（BUG-584～585） |
+| `TASK-rectification-other-collect-fallback-20260908.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-other-collect-fallback-20260908.md` | 七领域问完落到「也可以再说一件」、职业题从未出现、不自动出卡：`USER_COLLECT_QUESTION.other` 仍有三条活路（职业焦点 `target_domain` 压成 other 后被 active-focus 承接 followup 重建；set-focus 两次无效兜底查表；无领域采集归 other），`collect:other:*` 焦点挂着让 `persistNextInterviewIfIdle` 的出卡路径永远不跑 | 已验收通过（触发链仍 investigating，BUG-586 mitigated） | `9aec5029`（BUG-586） |
+| `TASK-rectification-probe-replay-loss-20260908.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-probe-replay-loss-20260908.md` | **P0** 收敛不了的直接原因：答完 5 道题范围收到 8 分钟，之后每补一件经历触发的重算换了候选集，`buildInferenceState` 找不到已答题定义（引擎与对照包按 asked keys 排除、状态 probes 不携带、分盘 key 内嵌分钟列表）→ `rounds:[]`、posterior=prior，交付回到 29 分钟；证据轮旁白不报范围变化；交付卡闪现待证实 | 已验收通过（真实 Case 范围收到 2 分钟；BUG-589 闪现 investigating） | `df182c16`（BUG-587～589） |
+| `TASK-rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908.md` | 范围已收到 2 分钟、决策已是采用，却再问答过的财务题：职业覆盖后的 yearless→采集分支（L2224）不看领域是否已覆盖；`shouldSkipFollowupPersist` 把它当剩余采集挡住出卡；`persistCollectFocus` 撞 id 无条件 `:next` 再插；holdout `occupied` 不认 health/health_pressure 同义 | 待验收 | `codex/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908`（BUG-590～591） |
 | `TASK-api-not-configured-mislabel-20260904.md` | `PROGRESS-api-not-configured-mislabel-20260904.md` | 16 处路由把数据库瞬断（部署切换窗口）兜底翻译成 503「服务尚未配置」；改为仅配置错误用该文案，其余 `service_unavailable`，收敛为共享 helper | 已验收 | `5483649b`（BUG-542）；2 条子进程测试留 CI Node 22 复核 |
 | `TASK-rectification-ux-20260902.md` | `PROGRESS-rectification-ux-20260903.md` | 会话面空白假死与交互摩擦 | 已验收 | `d159f08e`（09-03 在新基线重做后合入，BUG-505～509） |
 

docs/tasks/TASK-rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908.md

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+# TASK · 生时校正修复单：范围已收到 2 分钟、决策已是采用，却把答过的财务题再问一遍（2026-09-08）
+
+- 基线：`origin/staging` @ `df182c16`（BUG-584～589 已合入并部署；事故 Case 就是这版跑出来的，Skill 10.0.15）
+- 分支：`codex/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908`，基于 `origin/staging`
+- 执行方：coding agent；验收：Claude
+- 涉及文件：`frontend/src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/method-followup.ts`（L2224 起的 yearless→采集分支、`holdoutFollowupFor`）、`v9/server-focus.ts`（`persistCollectFocus` 的 `:next` 重试）、`v9/answer-choice.ts`（`shouldSkipFollowupPersist`）
+- BUG 编号起点：**BUG-590**（`docs/BUG_HISTORY.md` 当前最大 BUG-589）
+- 优先级：**P1**（收敛已经成功，出口被一道重复题堵死；用户原话"怎么又问相同的问题 而且时间已经收敛到 2 分钟的范围了"）
+
+## 1. 事故实证（2026-09-08 staging `df182c16`，Case 导出；只写结构）
+
+| 项 | 事实 |
+| --- | --- |
+| 推断状态 | 6 道题全部重放（`rounds` 6 条、`carried: true`、分盘 key 已是星座分区），`credible_range = 04:51–04:53`，`stop_reason = probe_pool_exhausted` |
+| 决策 | `type = ready_to_adopt`、`session_outcome = adopt_representative`、`can_adopt = true`、`step_state.stage = deliver` |
+| 当前问题 | `collect:finance:collect_method_evidence:next`，题干 = `USER_COLLECT_QUESTION.finance` 逐字。财务领域账本里已有一条带年月的确认事件（`usage = holdout`），该领域焦点早已 `resolved` |
+| 该轮 receipt | `rectification-set-focus` **failed** `focus_idempotency_conflict`；随后闲置路径把同题以 `:next` 后缀落库 |
+| 界面 | 没有区间交付卡（采集焦点挂着即 `interviewQuestionBlocksAdoptOffer`），输入框上方是财务题 |
+
+BUG-587 的重放已经把范围收到 2 分钟，出口本该是区间交付卡。
+
+## 2. 根因
+
+### 2.1 BUG-590（P1）：职业覆盖后的"无年份分盘题→采集"分支不看领域是否已覆盖
+
+`method-followup.ts` L2224：`!next && dashaCovered && coverageComplete && occupationCovered` 时取 `yearlessDiscriminators[0]`（本例是 D11 财富分盘的对照题，D24 学业题因账本已提到该分盘被降权、D12 家人题被拒答），把它的领域直接变成一道 **dated collect**（`intent = collect_method_evidence`、`source = method_coverage`、无 `choice_frame`）。分支只检查 `!declined.has(domain)`，不检查该领域是否已有带年月事件、是否已问过采集题。财务已经答过，于是再问一遍。
+
+这个分支的本意是"分盘对照题没有年份可锚，先向该领域要一件带年月的事"；领域已经有带年月事件时，再要一件也锚不上（引擎把它标成 `yearless_ungrounded_contrast` 不是因为缺事件），应当跳过该领域、继续找下一个，没有就交付。
+
+链条第二环：`answer-choice.ts::shouldSkipFollowupPersist` 对 `canAdopt = true` 的决策，只要 `isRemainingEvidenceCollect(followup)`（领域在 `DATED_COLLECT_ORDER` 里）就不跳过 → 采用被这道题挡住。第三环：工具层 set-focus 用同一 `next_followup` 落库，`questionId` 与已 resolved 的财务焦点相同 → `focus_idempotency_conflict`；闲置路径再来一次。
+
+### 2.2 BUG-591（P2）：采集焦点撞 id 时无条件加 `:next` 再插一次
+
+`server-focus.ts::persistCollectFocus` L359：`insertFocus(questionId)` 报 `focus_idempotency_conflict` 就改用 `${questionId}:next` 再插。这是 `75fc456d`（BUG-462 附带）为"穷尽采集撞开场题号"加的；BUG-586 删掉 other 穷尽采集后，它只剩副作用——同一领域的采集题只要被计划层重复派出，就一定能以 `:next` 落地。撞 id 本身就是"这题问过了"的信号，非 `collect_retry` 的采集题应当在这里止步。
+
+### 2.3 P2：holdout 的 `occupied` 不认 `health` / `health_pressure` 同义
+
+`holdoutFollowupFor` 用账本领域算 `occupied`，账本里健康事件的 `domain = "health"`，而 `oos_blind_prompts` 用 `health_pressure`；用户答了健康事件后，holdout 仍会把健康当"没用过的线"再问一遍。`datedCollectDomainBlocked` 已经用 `hasConfirmedHealth` 处理了这对同义词，`holdoutFollowupFor` 没有。本例没触发（财务题先挡住），但下一次会。
+
+### 2.4 记录：转录里选择题题干看似出现两次
+
+选择题的题干在问题块 `<p>` 与卡片 `<legend class="sr-only">` 各一份，后者只给读屏，复制文本时会一起带出。视觉上只有一份，不是缺陷，不立单。
+
+## 3. 决策记录
+
+1. **L2224 分支加覆盖守卫。** 遍历 `yearlessDiscriminators`（不只取 `[0]`），跳过：`declined` 领域、`hasConfirmedDomain`（含 `health`/`health_pressure` 同义）为真的领域、账本或已关闭焦点里已出现过 `collect:<domain>:*` 的领域。全部跳过则 `next` 保持空。
+2. **采用优先。** `shouldSkipFollowupPersist`：`canAdopt && nextAction === "adopt_representative" && stopReason === "probe_pool_exhausted"` 时，`isRemainingEvidenceCollect` 只有在该领域**没有**确认事件且未拒答时才算"剩余采集"；否则跳过持久化、走交付（`terminalNote`）。
+3. **撞 id 不再 `:next`。** `persistCollectFocus` 遇 `focus_idempotency_conflict`：`followup.collect_retry === true` 才用 `:next`，否则返回 `duplicate_focus`、不插入。`persistFocusAfterChoice` 把 `duplicate_focus` 当 `skipped` 处理，继续走交付分支。
+4. **holdout `occupied` 用同义表**：`health` ↔ `health_pressure` 归并（复用 `hasConfirmedHealth` 的口径）。
+5. 不动采用门、确认门、`MIN_SEPARATION_LEAD`、`_relative_support`、`minute_step=1`、`SCORE_DELTA`、四选项合同；Skill 不 bump。
+
+## 4. 任务分解
+
+### 4.1 BUG-590（决策 1、2）
+- 验收（形状用例，新建或扩 `rectification-occupation-coverage-exit.test.ts`）：
+  - (a) 账本：学业 2 件、感情 2 件、财务 1 件（`usage = holdout`）、事业 2 件、迁居 1 件、健康 1 件、职业 1 件；家人拒答；6 道题已答；yearless 目录里 D11/D2（财务）、D24/D5（学业）、D4（迁居）、D7/D12（家人）都在 → `buildMethodFollowupPlan().next_followup === null`。
+  - (b) 同 (a) 但迁居账本为空、未拒答 → `next_followup.domain === "relocation"`（守卫只跳过已覆盖领域，不是删分支）。
+  - (c) 同 (a) 的 dossier 进 `persistNextInterviewIfIdle`（decision `adopt_representative`、`probe_pool_exhausted`）→ 返回 `terminalNote: true` 的采用旁白，0 次 `setV10ConversationFocus`。
+  - (d) agent-run 集成：该轮结束后 `current_question === null`、客户端 `canOfferCards` 为真。
+
+### 4.2 BUG-591（决策 3）
+- 验收（`rectification-server-focus.test.ts` 扩）：非 retry 采集题撞 id → `status: "duplicate_focus"`，RPC 只调一次；`collect_retry: true` 撞 id → 仍以 `:next` 落地（原值 / 新值 / 原因三栏：原"任何撞 id 都 `:next`"→ 新"仅 retry"→ 决策 3）。
+
+### 4.3 P2（决策 4）
+- 验收：账本 `domain = "health"` 已确认、oos 提示 `health_pressure` → `holdoutFollowupFor` 不返回健康题。
+
+### 4.4 记录
+- `docs/BUG_HISTORY.md` BUG-590（关联 BUG-586：同一"职业覆盖后多问一题"的现象，不同分支；关联 BUG-587：收敛成功后才暴露）、BUG-591（关联 BUG-462 / `75fc456d`）；P2 记进 BUG-590 的防复发；`CHANGELOG.md`；`PROGRESS-rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908.md`；`docs/testing/rectification-scenarios-20260907.md` 加"七领域 + 职业问完后，下一步必须是区间交付卡，不得再出任何已答领域的采集题"。
+
+## 5. 让步顺序
+
+4.1 (a)(c) 当天必做并部署；(b)(d) 必做；4.2、4.3 同一提交；4.4 不可省。
+
+## 6. 开工前置命令
+
+```bash
+git fetch origin --prune
+git worktree add -b codex/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908 .worktrees/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908 origin/staging
+cd .worktrees/rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908
+ln -s /workspace/Jyotisha/frontend/node_modules frontend/node_modules
+cd frontend && ./node_modules/.bin/tsc --noEmit; npm run lint 2>&1 | tail -1
+ls tests/rectification-*.test.ts tests/agent-voice-copy-contract.test.ts | grep -v database | xargs npx tsx --test 2>&1 | grep -E "^# (tests|pass|fail)"
+```

docs/tasks/TASK-rectification-duplicate-narration-20260907.md

@@ -74,3 +74,21 @@ ls tests/rectification-*.test.ts tests/agent-voice-copy-contract.test.ts | grep
 ```
 
 开工时 tsc 若仍报 `rectification-agentic-chat.tsx` L1655（BUG-583），先确认 `codex/rectification-range-delivery-fix-20260907` 是否已合入；未合入则本单不修它，进度记录里写清基线含该错。
+
+## 验收（Claude，2026-09-08，`origin/staging` @ `df182c16`，staging 已部署同 SHA）
+
+| 门 | 结果 |
+| --- | --- |
+| tsc | 0 错 |
+| lint | 0 error / 102 warning |
+| 前端 rectification + consultation + voice + skill-registry（非 DB） | 1253 / 0 |
+| Python v5_services + growth contract | 全绿（执行方记的 15s 壁钟用例本机未复现超时） |
+| Docker DB 套件、浏览器走查 | 环境缺口，同执行方记录 |
+
+| 项 | 结论 |
+| --- | --- |
+| 4.1 BUG-584 | 通过。`stemAttached`/`publishedAny` 守卫；set-focus 后第二段 discard；半句 publish；三栏齐全。2026-09-08 真实 Case 每轮只剩一段旁白 |
+| 4.2 BUG-585 | 通过。`stripQuestionSentences` 在 agent-run 与 `attachQuestionsToTurns` 两处生效，`collectSpokenEmitted` 删除。真实 Case 正文不再含问句 |
+| 4.3 记录 | 通过 |
+
+结论：通过。

docs/tasks/TASK-rectification-other-collect-fallback-20260908.md

@@ -81,3 +81,21 @@ grep -rn "也可以再说一件" src tests   # 收工时必须为空
 ```
 
 与 `codex/rectification-duplicate-narration-20260907`（BUG-584/585，改 `step-answer.ts` / `agent-run.ts` / `collect-prompt.ts`）无文件重叠；谁后合谁 rebase。
+
+## 验收（Claude，2026-09-08，`origin/staging` @ `df182c16`，staging 已部署同 SHA）
+
+| 门 | 结果 |
+| --- | --- |
+| tsc | 0 错 |
+| lint | 0 error / 102 warning |
+| 前端 rectification + consultation + voice + skill-registry（非 DB） | 1253 / 0 |
+| Python v5_services + growth contract | 全绿（执行方记的 15s 壁钟用例本机未复现超时） |
+| Docker DB 套件、浏览器走查 | 环境缺口，同执行方记录 |
+
+| 项 | 结论 |
+| --- | --- |
+| 决策 1–5 | 通过。`grep 也可以再说一件` 为空；`parseCollectFocusQuestionId` 让职业承接不再压成 other；同轮二次 set-focus 幂等；`isOrphanOtherCollectFocus` 放行出卡 |
+| 2.2 触发链 | 仍 investigating（执行方按事实写 mitigated，接受） |
+| 真实 Case（2026-09-08） | 职业题正常出现、其后不再出 other 句；但暴露下一道题（BUG-590，见 `TASK-rectification-covered-domain-recollect-20260908.md`） |
+
+结论：通过。

docs/tasks/TASK-rectification-probe-replay-loss-20260908.md

@@ -83,3 +83,22 @@ cd .. && .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_rectification_v5_services.py -q
 ```
 
 与 BUG-584/585（`step-answer.ts` / `agent-run.ts` 剪问句）在 `agent-run.ts` 有交叠：范围句接在剪问句之后，**先合 584/585 再做本单**，或本单 rebase 到其上。与 BUG-586 无重叠。
+
+## 验收（Claude，2026-09-08，`origin/staging` @ `df182c16`，staging 已部署同 SHA）
+
+| 门 | 结果 |
+| --- | --- |
+| tsc | 0 错 |
+| lint | 0 error / 102 warning |
+| 前端 rectification + consultation + voice + skill-registry（非 DB） | 1253 / 0 |
+| Python v5_services + growth contract | 全绿（执行方记的 15s 壁钟用例本机未复现超时） |
+| Docker DB 套件、浏览器走查 | 环境缺口，同执行方记录 |
+
+| 项 | 结论 |
+| --- | --- |
+| 4.1 BUG-587 | 通过。真实 Case 导出：6 道题 `carried: true` 全部重放（`rounds` 6 条），分盘 key 已是星座分区，`credible_range` 04:51–04:53（此前同类流程为 29 分钟） |
+| 4.2 BUG-588 | 代码路径通过（compare 轮先剪问句再接范围句）；真实转录里没有范围变化的轮次可核，留待场景清单 |
+| 4.3 P3 | `!busy && caseSnapshotLoaded` 守卫已加；闪现未复现，BUG-589 investigating |
+| 4.4 记录 | 通过 |
+
+结论：通过。收敛成功后出口被 BUG-590 挡住，另立修复单。

docs/testing/rectification-scenarios-20260907.md

@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
 - 七领域问完后下一问是「你平时主要做什么工作？」，或已经可以交付时直接出区间卡
 - 不得出现补问兜底句「也可以再说一件你记得大概时间的事」
 - 职业答过、又没有剩余采集时，必须出现区间交付卡，不能只剩停止按钮
+- 职业也问完、决策已是采用后，下一步必须是区间交付卡，不得再出任何已答领域的采集题（例如已经答过的财务）
 
 ## 7. 每轮助手气泡只有一段旁白，题干只在问题块出现一次
 

frontend/src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/answer-choice.ts

@@ -82,12 +82,14 @@ import {
   buildNextUserAction,
   exhaustionSpokenCollectFollowup,
   isRemainingEvidenceCollect,
+  remainingEvidenceCollectStillOpen,
   planWithDateReliability,
   spokenCollectFallbackFollowup,
   spokenFollowupForUser,
   ledgerHasConfirmedDatedEvent,
   type MethodCoverage,
   type MethodFollowup,
+  type MethodFollowupEvidence,
   type MethodFollowupPlan,
 } from "./method-followup";
 import { followupCaseArgs, isBlockChoiceSchema, isWidenWindowSchema } from "./block-scan.ts";
@@ -230,6 +232,10 @@ function shouldSkipFollowupPersist(input: {
   followup: MethodFollowup | null;
   methods?: readonly MethodCoverage[];
   accepted?: boolean;
+  stopReason?: string | null;
+  sessionOutcome?: string | null;
+  evidence?: readonly MethodFollowupEvidence[];
+  declinedTopics?: readonly Readonly<Record<string, unknown>>[];
 }): boolean {
   if (input.accepted) return false;
   if (!input.canAdopt) return false;
@@ -244,7 +250,22 @@ function shouldSkipFollowupPersist(input: {
   }
   if (input.methods && !blockingMethodsCovered(input.methods)) return false;
   if (isRemainingDiscriminatorFollowup(input.followup)) return false;
-  if (isRemainingEvidenceCollect(input.followup)) return false;
+  if (isRemainingEvidenceCollect(input.followup)) {
+    const adoptExhausted = (
+      input.nextAction === "ready_to_adopt"
+      || input.sessionOutcome === "adopt_representative"
+    ) && input.stopReason === "probe_pool_exhausted";
+    if (
+      !adoptExhausted
+      || remainingEvidenceCollectStillOpen(
+        input.followup,
+        input.evidence ?? [],
+        input.declinedTopics ?? [],
+      )
+    ) {
+      return false;
+    }
+  }
   return true;
 }
 
@@ -791,6 +812,10 @@ export async function persistNextInterviewAfterChoice(input: {
     followup,
     methods: plan.methods,
     accepted: Boolean(input.dossier.case.acceptedTime),
+    stopReason: decision.stopReason ?? null,
+    sessionOutcome: input.nextAction.session_outcome,
+    evidence: input.dossier.evidence,
+    declinedTopics: input.dossier.conversationSummary.declinedSkippedTopics,
   })) {
     const facts = adoptDeliveryFacts(decision, liveDossier);
     const fallback = adoptHostNarration({
@@ -948,7 +973,12 @@ async function persistFocusAfterChoice(input: {
       prompt: null,
     };
   }
-  if (persisted.status === "created" || persisted.status === "already_open" || !input.followup) {
+  if (
+    persisted.status === "created"
+    || persisted.status === "already_open"
+    || persisted.status === "duplicate_focus"
+    || !input.followup
+  ) {
     return persisted;
   }
   if (persisted.status === "skipped" && !followupHasPersistableDomain(input.followup)) {
@@ -1224,6 +1254,10 @@ export async function persistNextInterviewIfIdle(input: {
     followup,
     methods: plan.methods,
     accepted: Boolean(dossier.case.acceptedTime),
+    stopReason: decision.stopReason ?? null,
+    sessionOutcome: decision.sessionOutcome,
+    evidence: dossier.evidence,
+    declinedTopics: dossier.conversationSummary.declinedSkippedTopics,
   })) {
     const facts = adoptDeliveryFacts(decision, dossier);
     const fallback = adoptHostNarration({

frontend/src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/method-followup.ts

@@ -1292,6 +1292,67 @@ export function isRemainingEvidenceCollect(
     && REMAINING_EVIDENCE_COLLECT_DOMAINS.has(followup.domain);
 }
 
+function collectFocusAskedForDomain(
+  topics: readonly Readonly<Record<string, unknown>>[],
+  domain: string,
+): boolean {
+  if (domain === "health" || domain === "health_pressure") {
+    return domainCollectFocusAsked(topics, "health")
+      || domainCollectFocusAsked(topics, "health_pressure");
+  }
+  return domainCollectFocusAsked(topics, domain);
+}
+
+function yearlessCollectDomainBlocked(
+  domain: string,
+  evidence: readonly MethodFollowupEvidence[],
+  declined: ReadonlySet<string>,
+  askedRows: readonly Readonly<Record<string, unknown>>[],
+): boolean {
+  if (domain === "health" || domain === "health_pressure") {
+    return declinedHealth(declined)
+      || hasConfirmedHealth(evidence)
+      || collectFocusAskedForDomain(askedRows, domain);
+  }
+  return declined.has(domain)
+    || hasConfirmedDomain(evidence, domain)
+    || collectFocusAskedForDomain(askedRows, domain);
+}
+
+/** Remaining spoken collect that can still add a dated event in an uncovered domain. */
+export function remainingEvidenceCollectStillOpen(
+  followup: Pick<MethodFollowup, "intent" | "domain" | "date_reliability_evidence_id"> | null | undefined,
+  evidence: readonly MethodFollowupEvidence[] = [],
+  declinedTopics: readonly Readonly<Record<string, unknown>>[] = [],
+): boolean {
+  if (!isRemainingEvidenceCollect(followup) || !followup?.domain) return false;
+  const declined = declinedDomains(declinedTopics);
+  if (followup.domain === "occupation") {
+    return !hasConfirmedDomain(evidence, "occupation") && !declined.has("occupation");
+  }
+  if ((DATED_COLLECT_ORDER as readonly string[]).includes(followup.domain)) {
+    return !datedCollectDomainBlocked(
+      followup.domain as (typeof DATED_COLLECT_ORDER)[number],
+      evidence,
+      declined,
+    );
+  }
+  return true;
+}
+
+function holdoutOccupiedDomains(evidence: readonly MethodFollowupEvidence[]): Set<string> {
+  const occupied = new Set(
+    evidence
+      .filter((item) => isConfirmedDated(item) && evidenceYear(item) != null)
+      .map((item) => item.domain),
+  );
+  if (hasConfirmedHealth(evidence) || occupied.has("health") || occupied.has("health_pressure")) {
+    occupied.add("health");
+    occupied.add("health_pressure");
+  }
+  return occupied;
+}
+
 export function exhaustionSpokenCollectFollowup(input: {
   evidence: readonly MethodFollowupEvidence[];
   declinedTopics?: readonly Readonly<Record<string, unknown>>[];
@@ -1682,17 +1743,22 @@ export function holdoutFollowupFor(
   declined: ReadonlySet<string>,
 ): Omit<MethodFollowup, "must_not_label" | "choice_frame"> | null {
   if (!meetsAcceptanceEventQuality(input.evidence)) return null;
-  const occupied = new Set(
-    input.evidence
-      .filter((item) => isConfirmedDated(item) && evidenceYear(item) != null)
-      .map((item) => item.domain),
-  );
-  const prompt = (input.oosBlindPrompts ?? []).find((item) => (
-    item.domain && !declined.has(item.domain) && !occupied.has(item.domain)
-  )) ?? null;
-  const reserved = (input.holdoutEvents ?? []).find((item) => (
-    item.year != null && !declined.has(item.domain) && !occupied.has(item.domain)
-  )) ?? null;
+  const occupied = holdoutOccupiedDomains(input.evidence);
+  const healthDeclined = declinedHealth(declined);
+  const prompt = (input.oosBlindPrompts ?? []).find((item) => {
+    if (!item.domain || occupied.has(item.domain)) return false;
+    if (item.domain === "health" || item.domain === "health_pressure") {
+      return !healthDeclined;
+    }
+    return !declined.has(item.domain);
+  }) ?? null;
+  const reserved = (input.holdoutEvents ?? []).find((item) => {
+    if (item.year == null || occupied.has(item.domain)) return false;
+    if (item.domain === "health" || item.domain === "health_pressure") {
+      return !healthDeclined;
+    }
+    return !declined.has(item.domain);
+  }) ?? null;
   return holdoutAskFields(prompt, reserved);
 }
 
@@ -2223,23 +2289,28 @@ export function buildMethodFollowupPlan(input: {
   }
   if (!next && dashaCovered && coverageComplete && occupationCovered) {
     const allowLowGainDiscriminator = !coverageComplete || !candidatesSeparated;
-    const yearless = yearlessDiscriminators[0];
-    if (yearless && (allowLowGainDiscriminator || yearless.score >= 0.08)) {
+    const askedRows = [
+      ...(input.closedCollectFocuses ?? []),
+      ...(input.declinedTopics ?? []),
+    ];
+    for (const yearless of yearlessDiscriminators) {
+      if (!allowLowGainDiscriminator && yearless.score < 0.08) continue;
       const domain = contrastFollowupDomain(
         yearless.eventProbe?.domain ?? yearless.contrastProbe?.domain ?? null,
       );
       const lead = YEARLESS_COLLECT_LEAD[domain];
-      if (lead && !declined.has(domain)) {
-        next = makeFollowup({
-          method_id: PROBE_METHOD_ID[domain],
-          intent: "collect_method_evidence",
-          ask_theme: REVERSE_VERIFY_THEME[domain],
-          domain,
-          kind_hint: REVERSE_VERIFY_KIND[domain],
-          user_prompt_hint: collect(lead, REVERSE_VERIFY_VARGA[domain]),
-          source: "method_coverage",
-        });
-      }
+      if (!lead) continue;
+      if (yearlessCollectDomainBlocked(domain, input.evidence, declined, askedRows)) continue;
+      next = makeFollowup({
+        method_id: PROBE_METHOD_ID[domain],
+        intent: "collect_method_evidence",
+        ask_theme: REVERSE_VERIFY_THEME[domain],
+        domain,
+        kind_hint: REVERSE_VERIFY_KIND[domain],
+        user_prompt_hint: collect(lead, REVERSE_VERIFY_VARGA[domain]),
+        source: "method_coverage",
+      });
+      break;
     }
   }
   if (

frontend/src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/server-focus.ts

@@ -356,6 +356,14 @@ async function persistCollectFocus(input: {
         prompt: null,
       };
     }
+    if (input.followup.collect_retry !== true) {
+      return {
+        status: "duplicate_focus",
+        focus: input.activeFocus,
+        questionId,
+        prompt,
+      };
+    }
     const retryId = `${questionId}:${COLLECT_FOCUS_RETRY_SUFFIX}`.slice(0, 160);
     if (retryId === questionId) {
       return {

frontend/tests/rectification-eight-method.test.ts

@@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ test("D9/D10 contrast after occupation coverage asks a discriminator, not adopt"
   }), "discriminate_candidates");
 });
 
-test("answered duty language skips window D10 and collects a dated education event instead of a yearless D24 card", () => {
+test("answered duty language skips window D10 and does not re-ask covered education from a yearless D24 card", () => {
   const packet = {
     candidateSetVersion: "05:00-05:07",
     vargaDifferences: [
@@ -2185,11 +2185,13 @@ test("answered duty language skips window D10 and collects a dated education eve
     evidence,
     contrastPacket: packet,
   });
-  assert.equal(plan.next_followup?.domain, "education");
+  // 原值: education（yearless D24 直接变成学业采集）
+  // 新值: finance
+  // 原因: CLASSIC_COVERAGE 已有学业；BUG-590 跳过已覆盖领域，改收未覆盖的财务
+  assert.equal(plan.next_followup?.domain, "finance");
   assert.equal(plan.next_followup?.intent, "collect_method_evidence");
   assert.equal(plan.next_followup?.choice_frame, null);
-  assert.match(plan.next_followup?.user_prompt_hint ?? "", /记得住年份/);
-  assert.doesNotMatch(plan.next_followup?.semantic_key ?? "", /varga\.d10/);
+  assert.doesNotMatch(plan.next_followup?.semantic_key ?? "", /varga\.d(10|24)/);
 });
 
 test("yearless D24 yields to a dated career dasha instead of borrowing the recorded education year", () => {

frontend/tests/rectification-occupation-coverage-exit.test.ts

@@ -7,15 +7,31 @@ import { OPEN_ENGINE_CAPABILITY_CEILING } from "./rectification-v9-test-support.
 import { decideRectification } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/core/rectification-decision.ts";
 import { trainingScoreableGate } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/evidence-model.ts";
 import { RECTIFICATION_SKILL_VERSION } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/case-status.ts";
-import { buildMethodFollowupPlan } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/method-followup.ts";
+import { buildMethodFollowupPlan, holdoutFollowupFor } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/method-followup.ts";
 import {
+  canShowRectificationSelectionCards,
   parseRectificationCandidateResult,
   workingRectificationHouseTable,
 } from "../src/lib/rectification-candidate-result.ts";
 import { decideFromDossier } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/decision-from-dossier.ts";
-import { evidenceLedgerFingerprint } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/tool-service.ts";
+import { persistNextInterviewIfIdle } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/answer-choice.ts";
+import { evidenceLedgerFingerprint, parseV9CaseDossier } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/tool-service.ts";
 import { latestResultToolProjection } from "../src/mastra/rectification-v9-tools.ts";
 import { isRenderableChoiceOpenQuestion } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/server-focus.ts";
+import { projectCurrentQuestion } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/turn-decision.ts";
+import { interviewQuestionBlocksAdoptOffer } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/turn-question.ts";
+import { candidateSetId } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/core/build-state.ts";
+import { asInferenceState } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/core/compose-receipt.ts";
+import { INFERENCE_ALGORITHM_VERSION } from "../src/lib/rectification-agentic/core/types.ts";
+import {
+  CASE_ID,
+  USER_ID,
+  candidateSnapshotFixture,
+  computeFixture,
+  dossierFixture,
+  fakeAccounting,
+  receiptHandlers,
+} from "./rectification-v9-test-support.ts";
 
 const STYLE_OPTIONS = [
   { label: "明确发生且时间吻合", answer_class: "yes" as const },
@@ -503,3 +519,343 @@ test("collect focus is still not a renderable choice card", () => {
     probe_id: null,
   }), false);
 });
+
+const ACCIDENT_EVIDENCE = [
+  dated("e-edu-1", "education", "education_start", "2016-09-01"),
+  dated("e-edu-2", "education", "education_completion", "2020-06-01"),
+  dated("e-rel-1", "relationship", "relationship_start", "2018-05-01"),
+  dated("e-rel-2", "relationship", "relationship_end", "2021-08-01"),
+  dated("e-fin-1", "finance", "finance_change", "2024-03-01"),
+  dated("e-career-1", "career", "career_entry", "2020-04-01"),
+  dated("e-career-2", "career", "career_change", "2023-07-01"),
+  dated("e-reloc-1", "relocation", "home_change", "2022-10-01"),
+  dated("e-health-1", "health", "self_health_event", "2021-11-01"),
+  {
+    id: "e-occ-1",
+    status: "confirmed" as const,
+    domain: "occupation",
+    datePrecision: "unknown" as const,
+    occurredFrom: null,
+    occurredTo: null,
+    eventKind: "occupation_note",
+  },
+];
+
+const FAMILY_DECLINED_TOPIC = [{
+  target_domain: "family",
+  status: "declined",
+  questionId: "collect:family:collect_method_evidence",
+  intent: "collect_method_evidence",
+}];
+
+const CLOSED_FINANCE_FOCUS = [{
+  questionId: "collect:finance:collect_method_evidence",
+  targetDomain: "finance",
+  intent: "collect_method_evidence",
+  status: "resolved",
+}];
+
+const ACCIDENT_YEARLESS = {
+  candidateSetVersion: "04:51-04:53",
+  vargaDifferences: [] as const,
+  probes: [
+    yearlessProbe("d11", 2.5, "finance"),
+    yearlessProbe("d2", 2.2, "finance"),
+    yearlessProbe("d24", 1.2, "education"),
+    yearlessProbe("d5", 0.5, "education"),
+    yearlessProbe("d4", 0.99, "relocation"),
+    yearlessProbe("d7", 1.22, "family"),
+    yearlessProbe("d12", 1.1, "family"),
+  ],
+};
+
+const ANSWERED_SIX = [
+  { semantic_key: "varga.d9.天秤座|天蝎座", answer_class: "yes" },
+  { semantic_key: "varga.d10.巨蟹座|狮子座", answer_class: "yes" },
+  { semantic_key: "career.2020", answer_class: "yes" },
+  { semantic_key: "career.2023", answer_class: "no" },
+  { semantic_key: "relocation.2022", answer_class: "no" },
+  { semantic_key: "finance.2024", answer_class: "no" },
+];
+
+function coveredDomainPlan(
+  extra: Partial<Parameters<typeof buildMethodFollowupPlan>[0]> = {},
+) {
+  return buildMethodFollowupPlan({
+    evidence: ACCIDENT_EVIDENCE,
+    contrastPacket: ACCIDENT_YEARLESS,
+    declinedTopics: FAMILY_DECLINED_TOPIC,
+    closedCollectFocuses: CLOSED_FINANCE_FOCUS,
+    answeredProbes: ANSWERED_SIX,
+    sessionOutcome: "adopt_representative",
+    ...extra,
+  });
+}
+
+test("yearless-to-collect does not re-ask a covered domain after occupation is done", () => {
+  const plan = coveredDomainPlan();
+  // 原值: next_followup.domain = finance（L2224 取 yearless[0]=D11）
+  // 新值: null
+  // 原因: 财务已有带年月事件且采集焦点已关闭；守卫跳过已覆盖领域后交付
+  assert.equal(plan.next_followup, null);
+});
+
+test("yearless-to-collect still asks an uncovered relocation domain", () => {
+  const plan = coveredDomainPlan({
+    evidence: ACCIDENT_EVIDENCE.filter((item) => item.domain !== "relocation"),
+    closedCollectFocuses: CLOSED_FINANCE_FOCUS,
+  });
+  // 原值: finance（D11 仍排第一）
+  // 新值: relocation
+  // 原因: 守卫只跳过已覆盖领域，不是删 yearless→采集分支
+  assert.equal(plan.next_followup?.domain, "relocation");
+  assert.equal(plan.next_followup?.intent, "collect_method_evidence");
+  assert.equal(plan.next_followup?.choice_frame, null);
+});
+
+function rpcAccidentEvidence(rows: readonly typeof ACCIDENT_EVIDENCE[number][]) {
+  return rows.map((item, index) => ({
+    id: item.id ?? `e-${index}`,
+    source_turn_id: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
+    subject: "self",
+    event_kind: item.eventKind ?? item.domain,
+    domain: item.domain,
+    occurred_from: item.occurredFrom,
+    occurred_to: item.occurredTo,
+    date_precision: item.datePrecision,
+    summary: "",
+    status: item.status,
+    supersedes_evidence_id: null,
+    created_at: "2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z",
+  }));
+}
+
+function accidentEvidenceFingerprint() {
+  return evidenceLedgerFingerprint(rpcAccidentEvidence(ACCIDENT_EVIDENCE).map((item) => ({
+    id: item.id,
+    eventKind: item.event_kind,
+    domain: item.domain,
+    occurredFrom: item.occurred_from,
+    occurredTo: item.occurred_to,
+    datePrecision: item.date_precision,
+    summary: item.summary,
+    status: item.status,
+  })) as never);
+}
+
+function yearlessInferenceProbe(layer: string, domain: string, gain: number) {
+  return {
+    id: `contrast:varga.${layer}.unsigned`,
+    semantic_key: `varga.${layer}.unsigned`,
+    candidate_split_hash: `varga.${layer}.04:51/04:53`,
+    domain,
+    year: 0,
+    question: `当前几个候选在 ${layer} 上还分得开。`,
+    candidate_ids: ["04:51", "04:53"],
+    expected_outcomes: [
+      { answer_class: "yes" as const, supports: ["04:51"], conflicts: ["04:53"] },
+      { answer_class: "no" as const, supports: ["04:53"], conflicts: ["04:51"] },
+    ],
+    information_gain: gain,
+    source: "varga_contrast",
+    choice_kind: "existence" as const,
+    style_options: STYLE_OPTIONS,
+  };
+}
+
+function accidentIdleState() {
+  const times = ["04:51", "04:52", "04:53"] as const;
+  const raw = {
+    algorithm_version: INFERENCE_ALGORITHM_VERSION,
+    candidate_set_id: candidateSetId("04:51", "04:53", times),
+    revision: 6,
+    phase: "discrimination" as const,
+    result_status: "discriminating" as const,
+    range_start: "04:51",
+    range_end: "04:53",
+    candidates: times.map((time, index) => ({
+      id: time,
+      time,
+      cluster_range: [time, time] as const,
+      prior_score: 30 - index,
+      posterior_score: 30 - index,
+      probability: index === 0 ? 0.5 : 0.25,
+      status: "active" as const,
+      rank: index + 1,
+      strong_conflict_count: 0,
+    })),
+    events: [
+      { id: "e-edu-1", domain: "education", year: 2016, precision: "month" as const, usage: "training" as const },
+      { id: "e-edu-2", domain: "education", year: 2020, precision: "month" as const, usage: "training" as const },
+      { id: "e-rel-1", domain: "relationship", year: 2018, precision: "month" as const, usage: "training" as const },
+      { id: "e-rel-2", domain: "relationship", year: 2021, precision: "month" as const, usage: "holdout" as const },
+      { id: "e-fin-1", domain: "finance", year: 2024, precision: "month" as const, usage: "holdout" as const },
+      { id: "e-career-1", domain: "career", year: 2020, precision: "month" as const, usage: "training" as const },
+      { id: "e-career-2", domain: "career", year: 2023, precision: "month" as const, usage: "training" as const },
+      { id: "e-reloc-1", domain: "relocation", year: 2022, precision: "month" as const, usage: "training" as const },
+      { id: "e-health-1", domain: "health", year: 2021, precision: "month" as const, usage: "training" as const },
+    ],
+    probes: [
+      yearlessInferenceProbe("d11", "finance", 2.5),
+      yearlessInferenceProbe("d24", "education", 1.2),
+      yearlessInferenceProbe("d4", "relocation", 0.99),
+      yearlessInferenceProbe("d7", "family", 1.22),
+    ],
+    answered_probes: ANSWERED_SIX.map((item) => ({
+      probe_id: `probe:${item.semantic_key}`,
+      semantic_key: item.semantic_key,
+      candidate_split_hash: item.semantic_key,
+      answer_class: item.answer_class as "yes" | "no",
+      classified_from: "choice" as const,
+    })),
+    rounds: ANSWERED_SIX.map((item, index) => ({
+      round: index + 1,
+      phase: "discrimination" as const,
+      probe_id: `probe:${item.semantic_key}`,
+      scores_before: { "04:51": 30, "04:52": 29, "04:53": 28 },
+      scores_after: { "04:51": 32, "04:52": 29, "04:53": 28 },
+      entropy_before: 1.1,
+      entropy_after: 1.0,
+      eliminated_ids: [] as string[],
+      winner_id: null,
+      kind: "informative" as const,
+    })),
+    last_inference_round: null,
+    entropy: 1.0,
+    representative_time: "04:51",
+    credible_range: ["04:51", "04:53"] as const,
+    holdout_passed: null,
+  };
+  const loaded = asInferenceState(raw);
+  assert.ok(loaded, "covered-domain accident inference must parse");
+  return loaded;
+}
+
+function accidentIdleDossier() {
+  const fingerprint = accidentEvidenceFingerprint();
+  const state = accidentIdleState();
+  return dossierFixture({
+    evidence: rpcAccidentEvidence(ACCIDENT_EVIDENCE),
+    evidenceCount: ACCIDENT_EVIDENCE.length,
+    latestResult: candidateSnapshotFixture({
+      selectionAllowed: true,
+      representativeTime: "04:51",
+      evidenceLedgerFingerprint: fingerprint,
+      candidates: [
+        { candidate_id: "88888888-8888-4888-8888-888888888881", rank: 1, time: "04:51", relative_support: 40, tied_minute_count: 1 },
+        { candidate_id: "88888888-8888-4888-8888-888888888882", rank: 2, time: "04:52", relative_support: 35, tied_minute_count: 1 },
+        { candidate_id: "88888888-8888-4888-8888-888888888883", rank: 3, time: "04:53", relative_support: 25, tied_minute_count: 1 },
+      ],
+      decisionReceipt: {
+        accept_allowed: true,
+        acceptance_allowed: true,
+        propose_allowed: true,
+        selection_allowed: true,
+        confirmation_allowed: false,
+        inference_state: state,
+      },
+    }),
+    conversationSummary: {
+      confirmed_evidence_summary: [],
+      pending_revisions: [],
+      active_focus: null,
+      declined_skipped_topics: FAMILY_DECLINED_TOPIC,
+      candidate_divergence_summary: null,
+      missing_evidence_categories: [],
+      last_result_policy: null,
+      summary_version: 1,
+      updated_at: "2026-09-08T00:00:00.000Z",
+    },
+  });
+}
+
+test("idle persist on the covered-domain accident delivers adopt and writes no focus", async () => {
+  const rpc = accidentIdleDossier();
+  const dossier = parseV9CaseDossier(rpc);
+  assert.ok(dossier, "covered-domain accident RPC dossier must parse");
+  const decision = decideFromDossier(dossier, { birthDate: "1997-08-08" });
+  assert.equal(decision.sessionOutcome, "adopt_representative");
+  assert.equal(decision.canAdopt, true);
+  assert.equal(decision.stopReason, "probe_pool_exhausted");
+
+  const accounting = fakeAccounting({
+    ...receiptHandlers,
+    get_agentic_rectification_case_dossier: () => rpc,
+    get_agentic_rectification_case_compute: () => computeFixture(),
+    set_agentic_rectification_conversation_focus: (_fn, args) => {
+      throw new Error(`must not persist ${String(args.p_question_id)}`);
+    },
+    append_agentic_rectification_turn: () => ({ turn_id: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333", idempotent: false }),
+    finalize_agentic_rectification_turn: () => ({
+      turn_id: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
+      status: "completed",
+      idempotent: false,
+    }),
+    get_agentic_rectification_turn_receipt: () => null,
+  });
+  const idle = await persistNextInterviewIfIdle({
+    accounting: accounting.client,
+    userId: USER_ID,
+    caseId: CASE_ID,
+  });
+  assert.equal(
+    accounting.calls.some((item) => item.fn === "set_agentic_rectification_conversation_focus"),
+    false,
+  );
+  assert.equal(idle.terminalNote, true);
+  assert.ok(idle.hostNarration);
+  assert.equal(projectCurrentQuestion(null), null);
+  assert.equal(interviewQuestionBlocksAdoptOffer(null, false), false);
+});
+
+test("agent-run still writes the exhaustion gate when idle persist returns terminalNote", () => {
+  const agent = readFileSync(new URL("../src/lib/rectification-agentic/v9/agent-run.ts", import.meta.url), "utf8");
+  const chat = readFileSync(new URL("../src/components/rectification-agentic-chat.tsx", import.meta.url), "utf8");
+  assert.match(agent, /idle\.terminalNote && idle\.hostNarration/);
+  assert.match(agent, /persistExhaustionGateTurn/);
+  assert.match(chat, /canOfferCards = canShowRectificationSelectionCards/);
+  const offer = canShowRectificationSelectionCards(
+    parseRectificationCandidateResult({
+      resultId: "55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555",
+      candidates: [
+        { candidateId: CANDIDATE_IDS[0], rank: 1, time: "04:51", relativeSupport: 40, tiedMinuteCount: 1 },
+        { candidateId: CANDIDATE_IDS[1], rank: 2, time: "04:53", relativeSupport: 35, tiedMinuteCount: 1 },
+      ],
+      overallConfidence: "medium",
+      selectionAllowed: true,
+      canAdopt: true,
+      confirmationAllowed: false,
+      representativeTime: "04:51",
+      selectedTime: null,
+      sessionOutcome: "adopt_representative",
+      decisionReceipt: {
+        accept_allowed: true,
+        acceptance_allowed: true,
+        selection_allowed: true,
+        propose_allowed: true,
+        confirmation_allowed: false,
+      },
+    }),
+  );
+  assert.equal(offer, true);
+});
+
+test("holdout occupied treats health and health_pressure as the same line", () => {
+  const evidence = [
+    ...ACCIDENT_EVIDENCE.filter((item) => item.domain !== "health"),
+    dated("e-health-ledger", "health", "self_health_event", "2021-11-01"),
+  ];
+  const fields = holdoutFollowupFor({
+    evidence,
+    oosBlindPrompts: [{
+      domain: "health_pressure",
+      user_meaning: "身体这条线还没用过。",
+      used_for_scoring: false,
+    }],
+  }, new Set());
+  // 原值: health_pressure
+  // 新值: null
+  // 原因: occupied 不认 health / health_pressure 同义时会再问一遍健康
+  assert.equal(fields, null);
+});
+

frontend/tests/rectification-server-focus.test.ts

@@ -784,8 +784,10 @@ test("collect persist maps occupation to other and health_pressure to health", a
   assert.equal(healthWrite?.args.p_target_domain, "health");
 });
 
-test("collect focus unique conflict retries with a :next question id", async () => {
-  const followup = collectFollowup();
+test("collect focus unique conflict is duplicate_focus unless collect_retry", async () => {
+  // 原值: 任何撞 id 都 :next
+  // 新值: 仅 collect_retry 才 :next；否则 duplicate_focus、RPC 一次
+  // 原因: BUG-591 决策 3；撞 id 本身就是这题问过了
   let writes = 0;
   const accounting = fakeAccounting({
     set_agentic_rectification_conversation_focus: (_fn, args) => {
@@ -800,7 +802,29 @@ test("collect focus unique conflict retries with a :next question id", async ()
     caseId: CASE_ID,
     activeFocus: null,
     decisionReceipt: null,
-    followup,
+    followup: collectFollowup(),
+  });
+  assert.equal(persisted.status, "duplicate_focus");
+  assert.equal(writes, 1);
+  assert.equal(persisted.questionId, "collect:relationship:collect_method_evidence");
+});
+
+test("collect_retry unique conflict still retries with a :next question id", async () => {
+  let writes = 0;
+  const accounting = fakeAccounting({
+    set_agentic_rectification_conversation_focus: (_fn, args) => {
+      writes += 1;
+      if (writes === 1) throw new Error("agentic_rectification_focus_idempotency_conflict");
+      return focusRowFromArgs(args);
+    },
+  });
+  const persisted = await persistServerOwnedFocus({
+    accounting: accounting.client,
+    userId: USER_ID,
+    caseId: CASE_ID,
+    activeFocus: null,
+    decisionReceipt: null,
+    followup: collectFollowup({ collect_retry: true }),
   });
   assert.equal(persisted.status, "created");
   assert.equal(writes, 2);