216 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
216 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
# Wealth Event Adjudicator v1.0
|
||
|
||
> 这是 `wealth` 题目域的专用裁决器。用于收入、财富积累、到账、套现、资产扩张、估值跃升、公众财富地位等问题。
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1. Route Freeze
|
||
|
||
先冻结三件事:
|
||
|
||
1. **任务类型**
|
||
- `prediction`
|
||
- `backtest`
|
||
- `rectification_support`
|
||
- `multi-option adjudication`
|
||
2. **目标粒度**
|
||
- `trend`
|
||
- `window`
|
||
- `month_level`
|
||
- `event_level verification`
|
||
3. **财富事件标签**
|
||
- `income_growth`
|
||
- `asset_accumulation`
|
||
- `liquidity_cashout`
|
||
- `public_wealth_status`
|
||
|
||
若财富事件标签不清,先说明判定对象再继续。
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 2. Four Wealth Layers
|
||
|
||
财富题目固定拆成四层:
|
||
|
||
1. `wealth promise`
|
||
2. `wealth activation`
|
||
3. `wealth manifestation`
|
||
4. `payout label`
|
||
|
||
### payout label 子类
|
||
|
||
- `income_growth`:收入增长、薪资提升、持续现金流增强
|
||
- `asset_accumulation`:资产沉淀、持仓扩大、房产/股权/长期财富积累
|
||
- `liquidity_cashout`:到账、套现、融资落袋、出售变现
|
||
- `public_wealth_status`:IPO、估值跃升、财富排行榜、公众财富可见度
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 3. Mandatory Layers
|
||
|
||
财富题目至少必须展开:
|
||
|
||
- `D1`: 2H / 11H / 5H / 9H / 10H / Jupiter / Venus / Mercury
|
||
- `D2`
|
||
- `D11`
|
||
- `D10`(若财富来自职业兑现)
|
||
- `Vimshottari + Narayana`
|
||
- `Shadbala`
|
||
- `Ashtakavarga`
|
||
- `Functional Benefic/Malefic`
|
||
- `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||
- `Real Case Calibration`
|
||
|
||
高严谨时尽量补:
|
||
|
||
- `Argala on 2H / 11H`
|
||
- `A2 / A11 / A10`
|
||
- `KP`
|
||
- `Yogi / Dhana / Lakshmi template hooks`
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 4. Evidence Ledger Roles
|
||
|
||
把财富证据按 4 种角色分类:
|
||
|
||
1. `promise`
|
||
- 本命是否具备财富承载力或财富兑现潜力?
|
||
2. `activation`
|
||
- Dasha / Transit / Annual / KP / Jaimini 是否点燃财富主题?
|
||
3. `manifestation`
|
||
- 这些激活是否足以落到现实收益/资产/现金流,而不只是机会、焦虑或纸面波动?
|
||
4. `payout_label`
|
||
- 最终更像哪一类财富事件:收入增长、资产积累、套现到账、公众财富地位?
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 5. Wealth Adjudication Order
|
||
|
||
### 5.1 Promise
|
||
|
||
先问:
|
||
|
||
- 2H / 11H / 5H / 9H / 10H 是否给出财富承诺?
|
||
- D1 的财富 promise 是否得到 `D2 / D11 / D10` 支持?
|
||
- Jupiter / Venus / Mercury 在题目域里是增强器、兑现器还是干扰器?
|
||
- 是否存在强财富模板钩子:
|
||
- `lakshmi_dhana_activation_chain`
|
||
- `yogi_asc_tight_orb_wealth`
|
||
|
||
若本命 promise 薄弱,不得因为单次 transit 或单个 Dasha 就断定“发财”。
|
||
|
||
### 5.2 Activation
|
||
|
||
必须检查:
|
||
|
||
- `Vimshottari` 是否激活 2L / 11L / 5L / 9L / 10L / Jupiter / Venus / Mercury
|
||
- `Narayana` 是否同向
|
||
- `Transit Jupiter / Saturn / nodes` 是否对 2H / 11H / 10H 有实质推动
|
||
- `Shadbala / Ashtakavarga` 是否支持“强而可兑现”的状态
|
||
|
||
若 `Vimshottari` 与 `Narayana` 明显冲突,标记 `mixed` 或 `blocked`。
|
||
|
||
### 5.3 Manifestation
|
||
|
||
这一层专门防止“有财运感,但没落到现实收益”。
|
||
|
||
要区分:
|
||
|
||
- `opportunity to earn`
|
||
- `actual income growth`
|
||
- `asset build-up`
|
||
- `cash-out / liquidity event`
|
||
- `public wealth visibility`
|
||
|
||
### 5.4 Payout Label
|
||
|
||
只有前三层通过后,才给最终财富事件标签。
|
||
|
||
禁止把所有财富事件都压成一个粗糙的“发财”。
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6. Defect Typology
|
||
|
||
财富线沿用婚恋线的缺陷类型思路:
|
||
|
||
1. `promise weak`
|
||
2. `activation/convergence weak`
|
||
3. `manifestation split`
|
||
4. `payout-label failure`
|
||
|
||
### payout-label failure
|
||
|
||
定义:
|
||
|
||
- 旧体系高分
|
||
- 现实财富事件明确成立
|
||
- 新聚合器没有把它抬成正确的财富标签
|
||
|
||
这是财富线最重要的回归靶子之一。
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 7. Template Hooks
|
||
|
||
优先调用并引用:
|
||
|
||
- `lakshmi_dhana_activation_chain`
|
||
- `yogi_asc_tight_orb_wealth`
|
||
- `strict-workflow-router.md` 的 `wealth-timing-strict`
|
||
- `divisional-chart-deep-reading.md` 中的财富链 `D2 -> D4 -> D10 -> D11`
|
||
|
||
若调用不到,必须在 Audit Table 里标注其对置信度的削弱。
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 8. Output Contract
|
||
|
||
财富输出最少要有:
|
||
|
||
1. `wealth verdict`
|
||
2. `confidence`
|
||
3. `main conflicts`
|
||
4. `Technique Audit Table`
|
||
5. `raw evidence`
|
||
6. `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||
7. `Real Case Calibration`
|
||
|
||
`MEVG / Global Web Evidence` 必须复用
|
||
`references/mandatory-verification-gate-protocol.md`,至少说明 source tier、
|
||
global web evidence collection、conflict arbitration 和未验证声明如何降级。
|
||
|
||
`Real Case Calibration` 必须给出真实案例参考、公开 benchmark case,或明确的
|
||
case gap。没有可比案例时不得假装完成,应降低置信度。
|
||
|
||
pure calculation exemption 只适用于纯计算、纯代码、纯项目维护或不解释运势意义的原始
|
||
数据输出;一旦解释财富运势、收入窗口、到账、资产或变现,必须执行 MEVG 与真实案例校正。
|
||
|
||
示例 verdict:
|
||
|
||
- `high_probability_window`
|
||
- `moderate_probability_window`
|
||
- `weak_window_needs_confirmation`
|
||
- `insufficient_evidence`
|
||
- `blocked`
|
||
|
||
最终还要给出:
|
||
|
||
- `payout_label`
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 9. Must-Not-Overclaim
|
||
|
||
以下情况必须降级或阻断:
|
||
|
||
- 只看 `Vimshottari` 没看 `Narayana`
|
||
- 只看 `D1` 没展开 `D2 / D11`
|
||
- 把事业曝光误当成财富兑现
|
||
- 把纸面估值误当成流动性到账
|
||
- 未说明 birth time precision
|
||
- 未说明 `Ayanamsa / Node mode`
|
||
- 未完成 `MEVG / Global Web Evidence`
|
||
- 未完成 `Real Case Calibration`
|